Answer:
most likely the fear that powers would encroach on the U.S. sphere of influence by carving out colonial territories in the Americas.
This is false.
<span>When verbal and nonverbal messages contradict, we tend to put more faith in the non-verbal rather than verbal messages. For instance, if a person tells you that they emailed you an important report, but while saying this, they touch their face, avoid eye contact and act "shifty", you are less likely to believe their words since their body language and actions contradict their words. </span>
Answer:
there are many exploitation cases in india
1. child labour- children under 14 work for their family earning
2.untouchables- they are from low caste they are not treated equally as much as high caste. but in this world all are humans does anyone think how will they feel if someonelse does the same thing
3.equality- women are not giving equal rights in villages.
like this there are many more. but pls remmember before exploiting anyone think before you act thank you ☺
Answer:
Yes. Such an action constitutes a tort and a crime.
Explanation:
A tort is a wrong done to another person while a crime is the breaking of the law of the state or Federal government. Put simply, a tort is a wrongdoing on a personal level while a crime is a wrongdoing on a societal level, while tort is privately morally wrong, crime is publicly legally wrong.
In the scenario above there is a 'tort' because the employees are spitting into the food of those they do not like. This is on a personal level as they are not spitting into the food of every customer but only the food of those they dislike. Also, a crime exists because this is happening at a public place. It can be said that those restaurants are intentionally serving unhealthy foods to members of the public and both the owners and employees of those restaurants could be charged.
