1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MA_775_DIABLO [31]
2 years ago
6

Anyone wanna help me? idc whts on the screen shot wont bother me

Mathematics
2 answers:
Alexus [3.1K]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Option A.

Step-by-step explanation:

-22 is a number that is less than-18. This automatically eliminates option B.

And also, the way that option A. moves is -22, -20, -19, -18, 18, 30. This is correct because -18 is closer to 18 than -22 is. -22 is farther to the left than -18 is.

Hope this helps! :)

Lyrx [107]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Its Option A.

Step-by-step explanation:

This is because -22 is a number that is less than-18. This automatically eliminates option B.

A. moves is -22, -20, -19, -18, 18, 30. This is correct because -18 is closer to 18 than -22 is. -22 is farther to the left than -18 is.

You might be interested in
Translate the following inequality into written language. 5x-6&lt;14<br><br> ANSWER QUICK
yuradex [85]

Answer:

5 times a number subtract 6 is less than 14

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If you if 3 1/2 pounds of bananas cost $1.96, how much would one pound cost?.
rjkz [21]
Basically divide 1.96 with 3/1/2 and 7/2 is the improper of 3/1/2

5 0
3 years ago
Enrique has to pay 80% of a $200 phone bill. Explain how to use equivalent ratios to find 80% of $200.
Virty [35]

Answer:

multiply 200 by .8

its 160

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which set of equations would have infinite solutions?
vaieri [72.5K]
The answer is b the two equations are equal to each other
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Because Charles David Keeling and his new colleagues began measuring CO2 in 1958, we now have an excellent record of how CO2 con
Alecsey [184]

Answer:

1. 516 ppm; 2. 561 ppm

Step-by-step explanation:

1. CO₂ increase at old rate

Time = 2100 - 2010 = 90 years

Increase in CO₂ = 90 yr × (1.4 ppm/1 yr) = 126 ppm

CO₂ in 2010 = 390 + 126 = 516 ppm

At the old rate, the CO₂ concentration in 2100 will be 516 ppm.

2. CO₂ increase at new rate

Time = 2100 - 2010 = 90 years

Increase in CO₂ = 90 yr × (1.9 ppm/1 yr) = 171 ppm

CO₂ in 2010 = 390 + 171 = 561 ppm

At the new rate, the CO₂ concentration in 2100 will be 561 ppm.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Find the median of the following set of data. Round your answer to the nearest hundredth, if necessary. 46.3,21.33,3,11.8,58.3,8
    5·1 answer
  • a cyclist rides his bike at a rate of 10 miles per hour. what is this rate in kilometers per hour? how many kilometers will the
    14·1 answer
  • .49027397189 out of 365 is what?<br> 12 POINTS
    13·1 answer
  • What did Zorna say about marring a shorter man
    13·1 answer
  • A balloon is blowing up at a constant rate of 9 cubic centimeters per second. When the volume of the balloon is 2048/3 pi cubic
    12·1 answer
  • A basketball is dropped from an original height of 9 feet and on each bounce, bounces up  2/3 the distance it fell. 
    14·1 answer
  • Two numbers are graphed on the line below. Consider the inequality t
    12·2 answers
  • ILL GIVE U BRAINLYIST
    7·1 answer
  • Nick, Sarah and Gavyn share some sweets in the ratio 2:3:3. Nick gets 28 sweets. How many did Gavyn get?
    8·1 answer
  • Write in word form: 40-(8+6)
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!