Is that the whole equation? Exactly from the book or paper?
A digit in the ten thousands place will always be greater than the one in the thousands place. Even though the number in the ten thousands place is smaller it will still be greater because 10,000>1,000 right? For example,
If you had the number 31,0
<u>Answer</u>
0
<u>Explanation</u>
(2m)/(2m+3)-(2m)/(2m-3)=1
Simplifying the left hand first
(2m)/(2m+3)-(2m)/(2m-3) = {2m(2m-3) - 2m(2m+3)}/(4m²-9)
(4m²-6m-4m²-6m)/(4m²-9)
= (-12m) / (4m²-9)
Now this equet to 1
(-12m) / (4m²-9) = 1
-12m = 4m²-9
4m²+ 12m -9 =0 ⇒⇒⇒ This is a quadratic equation that has 2 real solutions.
4m²+ 12m -9 =0
m² + 3m + (3/2)²= 9/4 + 9/4
(m + 3/2)² = 18/4
m = √18/2 - 3/2 or m = -√18/2 - 3/2
= 0.621 = -3.621
So we can say that the equation has NO extraneous solutions.
Answer = 0
(X-7)(x-1)
Minimal x values=7,1
Not the same x value
7 is the greater minimal value
Step-by-step explanation:
I think c is right answer
