Which is the best explanation for why Toms technique works ?

In BPC

tan\theta =a/b = 3/4

\theta = tan^-1(0.75)

\theta = 36.87 deg

BP = sqrt(a^2 + b^2) = sqrt((3)^2 + (4)^2) = 5 m

Eb = k Q/BP^2 = (9 x 10^9) (16 x 10^-9)/5^2 = 5.76 N/C

Ea = k Q/AP^2 = (9 x 10^9) (16 x 10^-9)/4^2 = 9 N/C

Ec = k Q/CP^2 = (9 x 10^9) (16 x 10^-9)/3^2 = 16 N/C

Net electric field along X-direction is given as

Ex = Ea + Eb Cos36.87 = (9) + (5.76) Cos36.87 = 13.6 N/C

Net electric field along X-direction is given as

Ey = Ec + Eb Sin36.87 = (16) + (5.76) Sin36.87 = 19.5 N/C

Net electric field is given as

E = sqrt(Ex^2 + Ey^2) = sqrt((13.6)^2 + (19.5)^2) = 23.8 N/C

8 0

3 years ago

In the year 2090, and Burt is still alive! Well, he’s really just a brain connected to a “life machine.” Since Burt has no body,

VLD [36.1K]

The answer is b hard theory

5 0

3 years ago

Irina finds an unlabeled box of fine needles, and wants to determine how thick they are. A standard ruler will not do the job, a

Vsevolod [243]

Answer:

$d=\frac{1.22\times 640\times 10^{-9}\times 21.7}{7.35\times 10^{-2}}=2305.21\times 10^{-7}m$

Explanation:

The expression which represent the first diffraction minima by a circular aperture is given by $d sin\Theta =1.22\lambda$ --------eqn 1

The angle through which the first minima is diffracted is given by $tan\Theta =\frac{y_1}{D}$ ---------eqn 2

As $\Theta$ is very small so we can write $sin\Theta =tan\Theta$

So from eqn 1 and eqn 2 we can write

$y_1=\frac{1.22\lambda D}{d}$ --------eqn 3

Here $y_1$ is the position of first maxima D is the distance of screen from the circular aperture d is the diameter of aperture

It is given that diameter of circular aperture is 14.7 cm so $y_1=\frac{14.7}{2}=7.35 \ cm$

Now putting all these value in eqn 3

$d=\frac{1.22\lambda D}{y_1}$

$d=\frac{1.22\times 640\times 10^{-9}\times 21.7}{7.35\times 10^{-2}}=2305.21\times 10^{-7}m$

8 0

3 years ago