Infamy is being known for something bad, like being infamous. Being known for a vile/terrible act. Kinda like what serial killers are, they’re known for their infamy
<h3>
Answer:</h3>
The exploration of human diversity in time and space.
<h3>
Explanation:</h3>
The reason why "The exploration of human diversity in time and space" would be the correct answer because this is the best statement that describes what anthropology is.
People who study anthropology study the societies and behaviors of human beings from the present and past. The anthropologists typically research the past and present societies, human remains, cultures, and other remains that are out there. They explore the ways humans have become diverse over the years.
Mostly, anthropologist study the way humans have formed from the past to the present, seeing the difference in the actions we make, our communication, and etc. Seeing how things developed overtime shows the anthropologist how we have changed and/or advanced. They try to research the evolution of humans.
<h3>I hope this helps you out.</h3><h3>Good luck on your academics.</h3><h3>Have a fantastic day!</h3>
Answer:
Ken has used the Split - Half techniques
Explanation:
The split-half techniques is used to assess the internal consistency of a test.
it measures the extent to which all parts of the test contribute equally to what is being measured.
This is done by comparing the results of one half of a test with the results from the other half. A test can be split in half in several ways.
This method of testing reliability measures internal consistency i.e how well the test components contribute to the construct that’s being measured. It is most commonly used for multiple choice test.
In relation to the above questions the action of Ken shows that he has used the split half techniques in order to assess the reliability of the test.
Answer:
a letter written by a person who is describing a current event
Explanation:
A primary source is a document from the time period of the event.
While most of these could be considered one, you have to do a process of elimination.
A scholarly article about an old event isn't a primary source, so it's not that.
An interview with a reporter who wrote about a current event is not a primary source because it is not the original document from the reporter.
A student's report about an event that occurred during her lifetime is a primary source, but it is not the best example.
