1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
podryga [215]
3 years ago
12

Un recipiente cilíndrico tiene un diámetro de 160cm. y la misma altura. ¿Cuánto litros de agua puede caber?

Mathematics
1 answer:
Len [333]3 years ago
8 0

Respuesta:

3215360 cm³

Explicación paso a paso:

Dado que :

Radio = 160/2 = 80 cm

Altura, h = 160 cm

Volumen de un cilindro = πr²h

Volumen del cilindro = π * 80² * 160

Volumen = 3215360 cm³

You might be interested in
Ok i’m stuck on this one
Natali [406]
180-149= 31
180-119-31=30
m<1=30
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help me with these questions please I need help? I'm confused with these questions can somebody explain me please.
san4es73 [151]
Rationals are whole numbers no negative numbers or decimals or fractions and Intergers are only negativd numbers. Absolute Value is a negative number changed into a whole number. Hope this helps.
5 0
3 years ago
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
3 years ago
Find the value of X. Write your answer in simplest form.
natita [175]

Answer:

45×7

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
There are many cylinders with a height of 9 inches. Let r represent the radius in
mylen [45]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

V, r, h are the volume, radius, and height, respectively.

V = πr²h = 9πr²

The only error in your previous answers was that you forgot the π.

if r = 1, V = 9π1² = 9π ≅ 28 in³

if r = 2, V = 9π2² = 36π ≅ 113 in³

if r = 3, V = 9π3² = 81π ≅ 254 in³

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A. In two or more complete sentences, explain how to find the exact value of sec 13pi/6 including quadrant location
    15·1 answer
  • In each family of functions, the parent function is the most ______ function in the family. A.) Linear B.) Basic C.) Complicated
    11·2 answers
  • two circles have the same center one circle has the radius of 3 centimeters and the orner has a radius of 1 centimeter what is t
    7·1 answer
  • Please click on the photo and help
    14·2 answers
  • ) a rectangular box has length 12 inches, width 20 inches, and a height of 7 inches. find the angle between the diagonal of the
    6·1 answer
  • a total of $67,000 is to be invested, some bonds and some in certificates of deposit (CDs). If the amount in bonds is to exceed
    8·1 answer
  • PLZ HELP WILL MARK BRAINLIEST..<br><br> Round 5.6 to the nearest whole number.
    6·2 answers
  • 8. Expo markers cost $4.99 per pack. There is a 20%
    11·1 answer
  • The graph below shows the number of words that Chanel can text each minute. Which of the following equations has a greater rate
    10·1 answer
  • Lesson 24
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!