Answer:
81.85%
Step-by-step explanation:
We have the following information:
mean = m = 52000
standard deviation = sd = 12000
a = 40000
b = 76000
we need to find the probability between a and b, that is:
P (a <x <b) = P (40,000 <x <76000)
P [(40000 - m) / sd <(x - m) / sd <(76000 - m) / sd]
replacing
P [(40000 - 52000) / 12000 <z <(76000 - 52000) / 12000]
P (-1 <z <2)
P (z <= -1) - P (z <= 2)
We look for this value of z, in the attached table:
0.9772 - 0.1587
P = 0.8185
In other words, the probability is 81.85%
Answer:
6 cm.
Step-by-step explanation:
Since they've given use the area of the triangle, we can use the area formula to find the base of the triangle.
The formula to find the area of a triangle is:
a= 1/2hb
h = height
b= base
We know:
a=24
h=8
Answer:
area= 41 cm^2
Step-by-step explanation:
area=5 x 8.2 = 41 cm^2
divide the rhombus in half either way and you have two identical triangles.
area of triangle =0.5 x base x height
double that for the two triangles and you have the area of the rhombus.
Answer:
C- Money lost from a pocket
Step-by-step explanation:
It would be C because something is decreasing ( now a negative) from what they did have.
Answer:
c)The proof writer mentally assumed the conclusion. He wrote "suppose n is an arbitrary integer", but was really thinking "suppose n is an arbitrary integer, and suppose that for this n, there exists an integer k that satisfies n < k < n+2." Under those assumptions, it follows indeed that k must be n + 1, which justifies the word "therefore": but of course assuming the conclusion destroyed the validity of the proof.
Step-by-step explanation:
when we claim something as a hypothesis we can only conclude with therefore at the end of the proof. so assuming the conclusion nulify the proof from the beginning
