Answer:
There were 2 primary types of government, a democracy, and a hierarchy. A hierarchy had a few different variants, the ruler had all power and was a god, the ruler controlled people, and the ruler had the most power but had a small house of other "government officials"
If I had a kingdom, it would have a democracy as its government. A group of advisors, the house/senate, and what many think is the ultimate power but has equal power, the president/king. Democracy is important. Not too much though, or else you get communism. Now, things were different back then. Most people kept what they had, and the citizens ran their own "government" of sorts. But a democratic government is still needed to control, and maintain the people. When I say control, I don't mean "give me all of your money and earnings and we will give you what you earned in food, water, clothes, and a house." That's communism. What I mean by control, is enforce the rules, make sure that the people don't tear each other apart, limb from limb. The people need guided to the decided way of living, which THEY CHOSE by voting. Therefore, they chose to follow these guidelines, and should not argue. That is how to run a stable government. On paper. Of course, there would be plenty of people who want to cause problems, but those things are too unpredictable to handle without communism. Not saying that it is the only way to run a government, what I meant was those things will be deal with at the time and can't be fixed on a simple word document for a history lesson on a computer learning system meant for a sixth grader to answer in a few sentences, about why you should be good to people, and not meant to go into detail about communism, and meant to see who understands how to live a happy human life, and who knows how to be the next "president" of Russia, and also just to see students creativity and knowledge of world politics as well as their downright opinion. I probably went into a lot of detail but hit the word limit.
Explanation:
hope this helps
I think we should have a vice president. If the president dies suddenly we won't want to wait years to vote again.We want a president right away. And if we are dealing with a problem in this country that only the president can take care of and he dies. The vice president can come in and resolve the problem. intead of waiting. if we wait the problem might get worse. So yes we should always have a vice president.
we, again, went in and did what the USA does best-win the war. ... You can't just bounce back from that. .... Washington to have a mutually beneficial end to their involvements with one another while claiming victory for themselves.
Gilbert du Motier, Marquis de Lafayette, a French aristocrat is known as the hero of both worlds, because he has brought great service to both France and United States, and also served towards a better relationship of the two countries.
