No. I do not agree with Stefan. Quite the contrary. I disagree
with his description of "<span>angle of incidence" as the angle between
the surface of the mirror and the incoming ray.
The correct description of "angle of incidence" is </span><span>the angle between
the NORMAL TO the surface of the mirror and the incoming ray.
Thus, the true angle of incidence is the complement of the angle that
Stefan calculates or measures.</span>
Answer:
3.085 [m].
Explanation:
1) The rule:
m₁*g*l₁=m₂*g*l₂, where m₁ and l₁ - the mass and distance for the small child, m₂ and l₂ - for the big child;
2) according to the condigion l₁+l₂=5, then
3) it is possible to make up the system:
4) finally, l₁=145/47≈3.085 [m].
Answer:
<h2>True Hope it's helpful. plz mark me as brainlist. </h2>
Answer:
the answer is kg
Explanation:
because the s.i unit for mass is kilogram
