The average speed, in km/minute, of the train is 2.79 km/minute
<h3>Calculating average speed </h3>
From the question, we are to calculate the average speed in km/minute
From the given information,
Distance travelled = 503 km
Time taken = 3 hours = 3 × 60 minutes = 180 minutes
Using the average speed formula,
Average speed = Distance / Time
∴ Average speed of the train = 503 / 180
Average speed of the train = 2.79 km/minute
Hence, the average speed, in km/minute, of the train is 2.79 km/minute
Learn more on Calculating average speed here: brainly.com/question/12025128
#SPJ1
First, you need to isolate the x in the first equation.
-x + 5y = 1
Subtract 5y from both sides, leaving you with the following equation:
-x = 1-5y
Because you are trying to solve for positive x and not negative x, you need to make x positive. Therefore you divide both sides by -1. In Algebra, when 1 is the coefficient of the variable, it is not shown, but it is still there. The new equation will be the following: x = 5y-1
Now you just need to substitute the x within the second equation for the x equation we just solved for.
Therefore, the right answer will be 2(5y-1)+4y= -4. Now, all you have to do is choose the answer that states exactly that, which is the first choice.
Answer:
21 / 143
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
Number of Eastern conference reps = 8
Number of western conference rep = 7
Probability of selecting 3 from Eastern reps and 2 from western reps
Probability = required outcome / Total possible outcomes
Total possible outcomes:
selection to be made = 3+ 2 = 5
Total Number of players = 8 +7 = 15
Total possible outcomes
Using combination formula :
nCr = n! / (n-r)!r!
15C5 = 15! / 10!5! = (15 * 14 * 13 * 12 * 11) / (5*4'3*2*1) = 360360 / 120 = 3003
Total possible outcomes = 3003
Required outcome :
8C3 * 7C2
8C3 = 56 ; 7C2 = 21
8C3 * 7C2 = 56 * 21 = 1176
required outcome / Total possible outcomes
= 1176 / 3003
= 21 / 143
Answer:
A. simpson's paradox
Step-by-step explanation:
The Simpson's paradox was named after Edward Simpson, the person who described this paradox for the first time in 1951. In this paradox, you find two contrary patterns. For example, a positive and a negative correlation, depending on how data is analyzed. The differences in the analyses are how data are grouped. This paradox is observed often in social researches. Most of the times, results are affected by the sample on each group or additional information related to the data.
