The surface area is multiplied by 5.
The surface area is divided by 5.
The surface area is divided by 25.
The surface area is multiplied by 25.
Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.
15,17,19 thats easy just keep adding two if you want to predict the next numbers
0.76 is the answer you go to hundredth place and look at the number next to it
Your answer would be A.
according to the 30°, 60°, 90° triangle rules,
side a would equal x
and side c would equal 2x
