When the particles of a substance (usually a liquid) is heated up, its particles absorb the energy provided thereby increasing their kinetic energy resulting to more movement of the individual particles.
If the O-Zone Tropo increased to a point, like it has, it can cause a huge variety of health problems and even death! Some of the problems include, but are not limited to: Asthma, E<span>mphysema, Chest Pain, Inflamed Lungs and Lung Scarring from tissue damage. </span>
Answer:
By a factor of 12
Explanation:
For the reaction;
A + 2B → products
The rate law is;
rate = k[A]²[B]
As you can see, the rate is proportional to the square of the concentration of A and the of the concentration of B
.
Let's say initially, [A] = x, [B] = y
The rate law in this case is equal to;
rate1 = k. x².y
Now you double the concentration of A and triple the concentration of B.
[A] = 2x, [B] = 3y
The new rate law is given as;
rate2 = k . (2x)². (3y)
rate2 = k . 4x² . 3y
rate2 = 12 k . x² . y
Comparing rate 2 and rate 1, the ratio is given as; rate 2/ rate 1 = 12
Therefore the rate has increased by a factor of 12.
Yes it could, but you'd have to set up the process very carefully.
I see two major challenges right away:
1). Displacement of water would not be a wise method, since rock salt
is soluble (dissolves) in water. So as soon as you start lowering it into
your graduated cylinder full of water, its volume would immediately start
to decrease. If you lowered it slowly enough, you might even measure
a volume close to zero, and when you pulled the string back out of the
water, there might be nothing left on the end of it.
So you would have to choose some other fluid besides water ... one in
which rock salt doesn't dissolve. I don't know right now what that could
be. You'd have to shop around and find one.
2). Whatever fluid you did choose, it would also have to be less dense
than rock salt. If it's more dense, then the rock salt just floats in it, and
never goes all the way under. If that happens, then you have a tough
time measuring the total volume of the lump.
So the displacement method could perhaps be used, in principle, but
it would not be easy.
