Answer:
1)The small early states that were established were greatly influenced by Indian culture, as was most of Southeast Asia. Indian influence in the region dates back to at least the 3rd century BCE. South Indian culture was spread to Southeast Asia by the south Indian Pallava dynasty in the 4th and 5th century. Influence of China and India. Between approximately 150 bce and 150 ce, most of Southeast Asia was first influenced by the more mature cultures of its neighbours to the north and west. Thus began a process that lasted for the better part of a millennium and fundamentally changed Southeast Asia.
2)Among the religions in Southeast Asia, the largest are Islam, Buddhism, and Hinduism. Christianity is also followed.
3)Angkor Wat is an enormous Buddhist temple complex located in northern Cambodia. It was originally built in the first half of the 12th century as a Hindu temple. Spread across more than 400 acres, Angkor Wat is said to be the largest religious monument in the world.
4)Between the tenth and fourteenth centuries, the kingdom that we call Angkor dominated much of mainland Southeast Asia. Its capital at Yasopdharapura, north of Cambodia's Great Lake, held over a million people, making it one of the most populous cities in the world.The Angkor Civilization (or Khmer Empire) is the name given to an important civilization of southeast Asia, including all of Cambodia, southeastern Thailand, and northern Vietnam, with its classic period dated roughly between 800 to 1300 A.D
In 1796, anti-Federalists gathered around Jefferson. Members of Jefferson's group called themselves Democratic-Republicans. Northern businessmen, bankers, and merchants supported the Federalists. They believed in a strong national (or federal) government.
This seems like an extremely biased "class." This is a very controversial topic that I can see both sides to, but for sakes of this question, will only explain the counter argument. How can you advocate killing people to spread a message not to kill people. Does it not seem ironic and oxymoronic to say "We don't support killing people, and we are going to show this by killing people who do it!" Also, some people believe the death penalty is too easy. Some victims' families would like the person to spend the rest of their life slowly dying in prison. Another bug argument is how humane is it? Obviously the electric chair is going to hurt, and even with lethal injection, there have been errors resulting in people having seizures and other body attacks while strapped to a table. These methods are not full proof and can be very inhumane.
Answer:
C. primacy effect.
Explanation:
Primacy effect: In psychology, the term primacy effect is a part of serial position effect, and is described as the propensity of an individual to learn the information that he or she encounters first better as compared to the information that is being presented later on.
Example: A student while preparing for his or her exams better remember the chapters he or she read first than the chapters he or she read later on.
In the question, the statement signifies the primacy effect.
The answer to "<span>One function of the constitution is to protect individual rights by limiting the role of government," is TRUE.</span>
