Answer:
Nope!
To sum it up, the 4 feet is bigger <:)
Step-by-step explanation:
Brainiest please!
One yard = 3 feet, and because there is 4 feet that means it is 1 yard AND one foot!
3+4i - 1 + 5i= 2 + 9i
the answer to the question is d
We don't know what the exact p-value is, but we are told that it's as large as 0.005 which is smaller than alpha = 0.05
Since the p-value is smaller than alpha, this means we <u>reject the null hypothesis</u>.
The way you can remember this is "if the p-value is low, then the null must go". By "low", I mean "smaller than alpha".
Recall that the p-value is the probability of observing that specific test statistic, or larger. So the chances of chi-squared being 18.68 or larger is a probability between 0.0025 and 0.005; there's a very small chance of this happening. The p-value is based entirely on the assumption that the null is correct. But if the null is correct, then the chances of landing on this are very small. We have a contradiction that basically leads to us concluding the null must not be the case. It's not 100% guaranteed of course, but it's fairly strong evidence.
In short, the p-value being smaller than alpha = 0.05 means we reject the null.
In order to accept the null, the p-value must be 0.05 or larger.
Least: 8 (length) x 1(width) = 8
Greatest: 5 (length x 4 (width) = 20
The difference between them: 20 - 8 = 12<span />
Answer:
the probability is 4/9 (44,44%)
Step-by-step explanation:
Assuming that each point inside the square is equally probable, then the probability is uniformly distributed in area of the square. Thus
probability = area where condition is true / total area of the square
for a circle of radius 1/3 inside the square ,the area where this condition is satisfied is a square with sides 1-1/3 = 2/3 , thus
probability = (2/3)²/1² = 4/9
thus the probability is 4/9 (44,44%)
