Answer:
<u>A Strategic Alliance</u>
Explanation:
A Strategic Alliance refers to a combined effort or activities of two firms so as to strengthen their market position and yet at the same time maintain their individual separate corporate existence.
It represents a mutually beneficial agreement between two corporate firms under which, terms are less binding and stringent than a joint venture.
The purpose behind such an alliance could be, expansion, product line improvement or together gain a competitive advantage.
Such an alliance helps both businesses achieve a common goal driven by mutual assistance and pooling of resources.
In the given case, the tie up between Caffery computer corp. and Chicago desktop to sell computer locking systems alongside computers, would be termed a strategic alliance, since such an arrangement would benefit both, reduce competition for each with collective gain w.r.t market share.
Answer:
Cognitive dissonance
Explanation:
Cognitive dissonance is a concept of social psychology and is described as the discomfort which is felt by a person who is having conflict in values and ideas. The people in this state feel guilt, embarrassment and anger. There is a motivational drive in humans to reduce the dissonance.
Leon Festinger developed theory of cognitive dissonance to predict and explain the peoples reaction to various situations. This theory states that people have prejudice to get agreement between what they expect and the reality.
Answer:
C. $ 7,500
Explanation:
Estimated direct labor cost $ 100,000
Estimated direct labor hours 20,000 hours
Predetermined rate per direct labor hours $ 5 per direct labor hour
Actual hours used on a job 1,500 hours
Applied overhead based on the predetermined overhead
rate per direct labor hours
$ 5 per direct labor hours * 1,500 hours $ 7,500
The information regarding machine hours is not relevant to the requirements of the question.
<span>C.) The amount of money earned in a week being invested in new book purchase
Hope this helps!</span>
Answer:
All equity plan:
EPS = $160,000 / 42,000 = $3.81
Plan I:
EPS = [$160,000 - ($108,000 x 7%)] / 39,000 = $152,440 / 39,000 = $3.91
Plan II:
EPS = [$160,000 - ($324,000 x 7%)] / 33,000 = $137,320 / 33,000 = $4.16
Plan II is better since the resulting EPS is higher than the other alternatives.
