All categories

2 years ago

Can someone help me out plz

Mathematics

1 answer:

EleoNora [17]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

The answer is 43.52 you're welcome

You might be interested in

Find the solution of 3 times the square root of the quantity of x plus 6 equals negative 12, and determine if it is an extraneou

Anna35 [415]

For this case we have the following equation:
$3 \sqrt{x+6}=-12$
Rewriting we have:
$\sqrt{x+6}= \frac{-12}{3}$
$\sqrt{x+6}=-4$
We raise both members of the equation to the square:
$(\sqrt{x+6})^2=(-4)^2$
Rewriting we have:
$x+6=16$
$x=16-6$
$x=10$
It's a extraneous solution because equality is not met by substituting x = 10 in the original equation:
$3 \sqrt{10+6}=-12$
$3 \sqrt{16}=-12$
$3(4)=-12$
$12=-12$
Answer:
The solution is:
$x=10$
It's a extraneous solution

6 0

2 years ago

When a constant force acts

yan [13]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

First expression: A= k/M

when A = 15 and M = 5, k = A×M = 75

therefore, when M = 4, A = 75/3 = 25

7 0

1 year ago

Explain why ΔABC cannot be shown to be congruent to ΔCDA.

igomit [66]

There isn't enough info to prove the triangles to be congruent or not. So we can't say for sure either way.

We have angle CAD = angle ACB given by the arc markings, and we know that AC = AC due to the reflexive theorem. However we are missing one third piece of information.

That third piece of info could be....

AD = BC which allows us to use SAS
angle ACD = angle CAB which allows us to use ASA
angle ABC = angle CDA which allows us to use AAS (slight variation of ASA)

Since we don't know any of those three facts, we simply don't have enough information.

side note: If AB = CD, then this leads to SSA which is not a valid congruence theorem. If we had two congruent sides, the angle must be between the two sides, which is what AD = BC allows.

4 0

2 years ago

What is the value of R?<br><br> 3r–8=7+8r

stellarik [79]

The answer to r is going to be the lucky number 5

6 0

3 years ago

Plz help me with this.

VashaNatasha [74]

Answer:zero

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

2 years ago