Rewrite as (2^1/2 + 2^1/2)*(18^1/2-2^1/2) = 8
Answer: Hello mate!
if x is the amount of hours worked, 45 is the slope and the y intercept is 35.
A linear equation has the form of y = ax + b, where a is the slope and b is the y-intercept, then the equation that we have is:
y = 45*x + 35
this means that she wins $45 per hour, and has a plane amount of $35, indiferent of the amount of hours worked.
Then the correct answer is
C) Grace's wage is $45 an hour, and it appears that she received a signing bonus of $35.
Answer:
5.6
Step-by-step explanation:because if you divide correctly it will equal 5.6
Answer:
- (x, y) = (3, 5)
- (x, y) = (1, 2)
Step-by-step explanation:
A nice graphing calculator app makes these trivially simple. (See the first two attachments.) It is available for phones, tablets, and as a web page.
__
The usual methods of solving a system of equations involve <em>elimination</em> or <em>substitution</em>.
There is another method that is relatively easy to use. It is a variation of "Cramer's Rule" and is fully equivalent to <em>elimination</em>. It makes use of a formula applied to the equation coefficients. The pattern of coefficients in the formula, and the formula itself are shown in the third attachment. I like this when the coefficient numbers are "too messy" for elimination or substitution to be used easily. It makes use of the equations in standard form.
_____
1. In standard form, your equations are ...
Then the solution is ...
__
2. In standard form, your equations are ...
Then the solution is ...
_____
<em>Note on Cramer's Rule</em>
The equation you will see for Cramer's Rule applied to a system of 2 equations in 2 unknowns will have the terms in numerator and denominator swapped: ec-bf, for example, instead of bf-ec. This effectively multiplies both numerator and denominator by -1, so has no effect on the result.
The reason for writing the formula in the fashion shown here is that it makes the pattern of multiplications and subtractions easier to remember. Often, you can do the math in your head. This is the method taught by "Vedic maths" and/or "Singapore math." Those teaching methods tend to place more emphasis on mental arithmetic than we do in the US.
Check the picture.
let the length of a side of each of the squares removed be x.
The box formed will have dimensions: 80-2x, 50-2x, x(the height)
So the volume can be expressed as a function of x as follows:
f(x)=(80-2x)(50-2x)x=
so
the solutions of f'(x)=0 gives the inflection points, so the candidates for maxima points,
solving the quadratic equation, either by a calculator, graphing software, or by other algebraic methods as the discriminant formula, we find the solutions
x=10 and x=33.333
plug in f(x) these values to see which greater:
cm cubed
which is negative because (50-66.666)<0
Answer: 18000 cm cubed