1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Norma-Jean [14]
3 years ago
10

If hari buys 20biscuits for Rs 200 and sells it for Rs 100 find the loss​

Mathematics
2 answers:
dimulka [17.4K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

hdvbn

Step-by-step explanation:

nfshvjjnmmnjjmbm

vlabodo [156]3 years ago
6 0
He buys 20 biscuits for 200 (1 biscuit for 10)
And sells 20 biscuits for 100 (1 biscuit for 5)
The loss is 100
You might be interested in
Which equation can be used to find the measure of angle LJK?
Alexxandr [17]

Answer: cos(x)= 10/15

Step-by-step explanation:

Trust

3 0
3 years ago
A kite was broken into two triangles of the same size and shape. The area of each triangle is square centimeters. The total area
Lera25 [3.4K]

Answer: Each triangle:40 cm²

Kite : 80cm²

Step-by-step explanation:

The area of a triangle is

1/2bh

The height of the triangle is

h=1/2(10)=5cm

and the base is 16 cm.

The area of each triangle is

= 1/2(16)(5)=40cm^2

2. The total area of the kite is 2 times the area of one triangle.

= 2*40=80cm^2

3 0
3 years ago
ASAP ASAP ASAP PLEASEEEEEEEE
tester [92]
I think it’s irrational, because the 5 is repeating
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A roulette wheel has 37 numbers (0 through 36).
NeX [460]

\large\boxed{\frac{1}{1369}}

We'll assume that there is an equal probability of any position on the wheel, so a \frac{1}{37} chance for any given number.

We must take the probability of getting a 27, then the probability of getting a 15, and multiply them together to find the chances that they both happen in a row.

\frac{1}{37}\cdot\frac{1}{37}=\boxed{\frac{1}{1369}}

5 0
2 years ago
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The radius of a clock face is 8.5 cm.what is the area of a clock face?approximate pi as 3.14.
    7·1 answer
  • A composite figure is a _____. figure made up of 3 or more basic shapes figure that is 1/2 of another shape trapezoid figure mad
    10·2 answers
  • How do you workout this question?
    14·2 answers
  • 178 is 89% of what amount?
    9·2 answers
  • Evaluate the expression: x/5 + 18 - x, when x = 15
    5·1 answer
  • Fill in the missing number
    9·1 answer
  • Anyone wana talk to me join my zooom I am really bored Room ID: 582 714 7014<br><br>Passd: 0000​ ​
    7·2 answers
  • Simplify/Solve: Lesson 33<br><br> (Also please do the numbers ex: 14e: {answer])
    13·2 answers
  • Special Pairs of angles and Classifying Triangles (PLEASE HELP)
    12·1 answer
  • 3a: complete the table with values for x and y that makes this equation true 3x+y=15
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!