Yes it is correct the chart is increasing
Answer:
Annual deposit (PMT) = $1,567,060.39
Explanation:
Given:
Future value of annuity due = $8,000,000
Rate of interest(r) = 10% = 0.1
Number of year (n) = 4 year
Annual deposit (PMT) = ?
Computation of annual deposit :
\\\\8,000,000 = PMT [\frac{(1+0.1)^4-1}{0.1} ](1+0.1)\\\\8,000,000 = PMT [\frac{(1.1)^4-1}{0.1} ](1.1)\\\\8,000,000 = PMT [\frac{(0.4641}{0.1} ](1.1)\\\\8,000,000 = PMT [5.1051]\\PMT = 1,567,060.39](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Future%5C%20value%5C%20of%5C%20annuity%5C%20due%20%3D%20PMT%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B%281%2Br%29%5En-1%7D%7Br%7D%20%5D%281%2Br%29%5C%5C%5C%5C8%2C000%2C000%20%3D%20PMT%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B%281%2B0.1%29%5E4-1%7D%7B0.1%7D%20%5D%281%2B0.1%29%5C%5C%5C%5C8%2C000%2C000%20%3D%20PMT%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B%281.1%29%5E4-1%7D%7B0.1%7D%20%5D%281.1%29%5C%5C%5C%5C8%2C000%2C000%20%3D%20PMT%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B%280.4641%7D%7B0.1%7D%20%5D%281.1%29%5C%5C%5C%5C8%2C000%2C000%20%3D%20PMT%20%5B5.1051%5D%5C%5CPMT%20%3D%201%2C567%2C060.39)
Annual deposit (PMT) = $1,567,060.39
Answer:
increase its production of building stone
Explanation:
I don’t know what your saying I’m confused I’m sorry
Answer:
d. even if Ichiro was only slightly at fault.
Explanation:
If Ichiro is suing Heather for negligence, but he himself is found to have negiglent as well, his possibilities of winning the case are less even if he was only slightly at fault.
This is because the fact that he was negligent as well reduces his condition of victim, and makes him an active participant in the accident. In other words, if Ichiro is found negligent, it means that the accident and his subsequent injuries were also his fault.
