1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Naily [24]
2 years ago
11

what is the line of argument on history against the violation of human rights from the 1950s to 1960s??​

History
1 answer:
Aleksandr [31]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Those years were part of the Civil Rights era.

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

You might be interested in
The central message of the Age of Enlightenment was that _____ is the principal guide to human conduct.
mash [69]
Human reason, is the answer
6 0
3 years ago
After the Civil War, some southern states established the Black Codes, which included regulations such as black people needing t
ioda

Answer:

nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
How did the mexican-american war lead to greater sectionalism within the united states government?
gogolik [260]

There was great tension between pro-slavery and anti-slavery representatives over how new territories won would handle the issue of slavery.

The Mexican-American War and the 1848 Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, forced onto the remnant Mexican government,  drew some criticism in the U.S. for their casualties, monetary cost, and heavy-handedness. Furthermore, the question of how to treat the new acquisitions also intensified the debate over slavery and in many ways inflamed it, as potential westward expansion of the institution took an increasingly central and heated theme in national debates preceding the American Civil War.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Building a railroad from the coast of Kenya inland led to the importance of..
weqwewe [10]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

issbusnsjsbsjdbdjshsjsbsbshshshsbhsbsbehsbshebehshebsbshbssbbshsebbeshbe

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1.) What was the Kansas-Nebraska Act? Write one or two sentences.
Julli [10]

Answer: 1. 1854 bill that mandated popular sovereignty. It allowed settlers to decide if they wanted slavery in their state or not.

2. The North was very very very mad. The Missouri Compromise had made this from happening all the way back in 1820.

3. It was greatly praised. But anti slave people in the South wanted another vote. But pro slave people didn't vote because they wanted to keep slavery.

4. President Franklin Pierce

5. It allowed people to decide for themselves and they didn't have to like slavery

Explanation: Brainliest please

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which best summarizes the point of document 1
    12·1 answer
  • PLS help 57 pts and marked brainly if right
    7·2 answers
  • Why did many united states farmers fail to benefit from the economic prosperity of the 1920s?
    13·1 answer
  • A.
    9·1 answer
  • Voters elect people to many offices other than that of the President. Which of the following are NOT elected by voters?
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following resulted from encounters between the Spanish and Native Americans?
    10·1 answer
  • If you could interview any-one person in history, who would it be? Tell us why you would select this person. What kind of questi
    13·1 answer
  • What were some things that people hated about Russia?​
    11·1 answer
  • Thinking about all of the fighting that Texas has gone through since it was discovered. Do you think that conflict be justified
    11·2 answers
  • How did the hundred years war affect medieval Europe
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!