So the side length became 0.6*5 = 3 cm.
Answer:
A) The model exists: f(x) = -3x^2 +4x -4
Step-by-step explanation:
A quadratic model will always exist for 3 given points, provided they are not on a line. In that case, a linear model is appropriate.
Here, the slope between -1 and 0 is positive, and the slope between 0 and 3 is negative. Thus, we know these points are not collinear, and a model must exist.
The model is most easily found using a quadratic regression tool. Such is shown in the attachment. It tells us that ...
f(x) = -3x^2 +4x -4
<h2>2x+y=2</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
Let
be the point 
Let
be the point 
The equation of the line passing through two points 
and
is 
substituting
in the above equation yields

which when simplified gives 
which when further simplified gives 
<span>16:28 is the ratio
But you have to get that in the simplest form so it would be 4:7</span>
Sally did some counting look at her work explain why you think sally counted this way 177,178,179,180,190,200,220,211,212,213,21
dimulka [17.4K]
<span>The first and last four numbers each have a difference of one between them.
The fifth number has a difference of 10 between it and the previous number.
The middle number has a difference of 20 between itself and the two numbers that surround it.
Counting in this way could have been a result of a lot of things to count, and spot checking along the way (when the numbers have a difference of 1).</span>