Answer:
Im gonna guess 6
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Null hypothesis is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
Alternative hypothesis is U1 - U2 > 0
Step-by-step explanation:
The question involves a comparison of the two types of training given to the salespeople. The requirement is to set up the hypothesis that type A training leads to higher mean weakly sales compared to type B training.
Let U1 = mean sales by type A trainees
Let U2 = mean sales by type B trainees
Therefore, the null hypothesis (H0) is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
This implies that type A training does not result in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
The alternative hypothesis (H1) is: U1 - U2 > 0
This implies that type A training indeed results in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
We have the compound inequality:
Let's solve each of them individually first:
We have:
Divide both sides by 2:
Add 1 to both sides:
We have:
Subtract from both sides:
Divide both sides by -4:
Hence, our solution set is:
To solve -3y=-5x-12 you would
have to divide everything in the equation by -3
Y=5/3x+4
