1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
BlackZzzverrR [31]
3 years ago
11

ABCD is a parallelogram. Find the measure of ABC.

Mathematics
1 answer:
MaRussiya [10]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

50°

Step-by-step explanation:

As we know that the opposite angles of parallelogram are equal so

< ADC = < ABC

< ABC = 38° +12°

< ABC = 50°

Hope it will help :)

You might be interested in
(4x1000) + (2x100) + (3x1/10)
disa [49]
(4*1000) + (2*100) + (3*1/10) = <span>4200.3
</span>(4x1000) + (2x100) + (3x1/10) = <span>4200.3
</span>
Both are equal.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Giving brainlist to whoever answers
just olya [345]

Answer:

False

Step-by-step explanation:

V=bhw\\V=7.5*13*2\\V=195

6 0
3 years ago
Can someone help me with the area of this please
Georgia [21]

Answer:

60 meters

Step-by-step explanation:

15x4=60 ez maths cmon

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A data mining routine has been applied to a transaction dataset and has classified 88 records as fraudulent (30 correctly so) an
chubhunter [2.5K]

Answer:

The classification matrix is attached below

Part a

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is 65.91%.

Part b

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is 96.64%

Step-by-step explanation:

The classification matrix is obtained as shown below:

The transaction dataset has 30 fraudulent correctly classified records out of 88 records, that is, 30 records are correctly predicted given that an instance is negative.

Also, there would be 88 - 30 = 58 non-fraudulent incorrectly classified records, that is, 58 records are incorrectly predicted given that an instance is positive.

The transaction dataset has 920 non-fraudulent correctly classified records out of 952 records, that is, 920 records are correctly predicted given that an instance is positive.

Also, there would be 952 - 920 = 32 fraudulent incorrectly classified records, that is, 32 records incorrectly predicted given that an instance is negative.

That is,

                                                                            Predicted value

                           Active value                 Fraudulent       Non-fraudulent

                              Fraudlent                         30                       58

                          non-fraudulent                   32                     920

The classification matrix is obtained by using the information related to the transaction data, which is classified into fraudulent records and non-fraudulent records.

The error rate is obtained as shown below:

The error rate is obtained by taking the ratio of \left( {b + c} \right)(b+c) and the total number of records.

The classification matrix is, shown above

The total number of records is, 30 + 58 + 32 + 920 = 1,040

The error rate is,

\begin{array}{c}\\{\rm{Error}}\,{\rm{rate}} = \frac{{b + c}}{{{\rm{Total}}}}\\\\ = \frac{{58 + 32}}{{1,040}}\\\\ = \frac{{90}}{{1,040}}\\\\ = 0.0865\\\end{array}  

The percentage is 0.0865 \times 100 = 8.65

(a)

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is obtained by taking the rate ratio of b and \left( {a + b} \right)(a+b) .

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is obtained as shown below:

The classification matrix is, shown above and in the attachment

The error rate for truly fraudulent is,

\begin{array}{c}\\FP = \frac{b}{{a + b}}\\\\ = \frac{{58}}{{30 + 58}}\\\\ = \frac{{58}}{{88}}\\\\ = 0.6591\\\end{array}  

The percentage is, 0.6591 \times 100 = 65.91

(b)

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is obtained by taking the ratio of d and \left( {c + d} \right)(c+d) .

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is obtained as shown below:

The classification matrix is, shown in the attachment

The error rate for truly non-fraudulent is,

\begin{array}{c}\\TP = \frac{d}{{c + d}}\\\\ = \frac{{920}}{{32 + 920}}\\\\ = \frac{{920}}{{952}}\\\\ = 0.9664\\\end{array}

The percentage is, 0.9664 \times 100 = 96.64

8 0
3 years ago
Round 3184.5641 to the nearest hundred
Sonja [21]
When you round you have to check the number to the right of the number you are rounding. If the number to the right is 0-4 then you keep the number the same. 5-9 the number you are rounding goes up by one. Now the 4 before the decimal point is in the ones spot. The 5 to the right of the 4 is the tenth spot and the 6 to the right of that is in the hundredth spot. so this is where we need to round. To the right of the 6 is a 4 so the number would stay the same. Now when you round you drop all the numbers after it so the number is 3184.56
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Find the product 82x 3
    10·2 answers
  • HELP ASAP! BRAINLIEST!
    5·2 answers
  • Let f(x) = 14x3 + 28x2 – 46x and g(x) = 2x + 7. which is the solution set to the equation 1 12 f(x) = g(x)?
    11·1 answer
  • Sam and Maria were shopping for school supplies. Each purchased different quantities of the same notebook and thumb drive. Sam b
    15·1 answer
  • Write 1,386 as the product of it prim fa
    6·1 answer
  • Find the missing side round to the nearest tenth can someone please help me this is my last question
    13·1 answer
  • Today, a bicycle rider rode her bike 5 1/2 miles to raise money for her school. Yesterday, she rode 6 1/4 miles her grandfather
    6·2 answers
  • a recent study showed that the average high school basketball team score 76 points a game with a standard deviation of 8.4 point
    11·1 answer
  • Explain whether 20/16 is an equivalent ratio to 60/48
    9·1 answer
  • What is the slope? (5,6) and (-1, 4)
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!