4.

5.

doesn't belong with the other three because it is irrational number
The other three can be expressed as a ratio between two <span>integers.

</span>
Answer:
No.
Step-by-step explanation:
Well at first glance it might seem so but there are two points particularly that can tell you that these points cannot be within a function.
The points (3,2) and (3,-2) will yield an undefined slope (a straight vertical line). There is no possibility that the other points can be in this line (as their y - values are different) and there is no possibilty that this is a function at all according to the vertical line test (the test is that if you draw a vertical line that there shouldn't be more than one point on it).
Let width of the floor be x feet, them area is
x(x+2) = 168
x^2 + 2x - 168 = 0
(x - 12)(x + 14) - 0
so x = 12
the floor is 12 ft by 10 ft
the width of the rug should be 10 - 2(2) = 6 feet
Answer:
you would mark at 3/5.
Step-by-step explanation:
because 3/5 divided by 1/10 is 6.
then you would convert that to a decimal then fraction and that would end up being 3/5