title=" \underline{ \underline{ \text{Question}}} : " alt=" \underline{ \underline{ \text{Question}}} : " align="absmiddle" class="latex-formula"> In the adjoining figure , AD is the bisector of
BAC and AD
EC. Prove that AC = AE .
~Thanks in advance ! ♡
2 answers:
Answer:
In the given figure AD is internal bisector of angle A and CE is parallel to DA. If CE meets BA produced at E.
to prove : AC = AE
<BAC + <EAC = 180° ( Straight line)
In triangle ACE
<ACE + <AEC + <EAC = 180° (sum ofangles of Triangle)
Equating both
<BAC + <EAC = <ACE + <AEC + <EAC
=<BAC = <ACE + <AEC.......... Eq 1
<BAD = (1/2) <BAC
<BAD = <AEC so (AD || CE)
we get
<AEC = (1/2) <BAC
putting this in eq 1
=<BAC = <ACE + <AEC Eq1
<BAD = (1/2) <BAC
<BAD = <AEC (AD || CE)
=<AEC = (1/2) <BAC
<AEC=<ACE=1/2 <BAC
: AC = AE
<em><u>h</u></em> <em><u>e</u></em> <em><u>n</u></em> <em><u>c</u></em> <em><u>e</u></em> <em><u> </u></em> <em><u>p</u></em> <em><u>r</u></em> <em><u>o</u></em> <em><u>v</u></em> <em><u>e</u></em> <em><u>d</u></em> <em><u>.</u></em>
Answer:
See Below.
Step-by-step explanation:
Statements: Reasons:
Given
Definition of Bisector
Given
Alternate Interior Angles Theorem*
Corresponding Angles Theorem*
Substitution
Substitution
Isosceles Theorem Converse
*Please refer to the attachment below.
Let me know if you have any questions!
You might be interested in
Answer:
x= -12
Step-by-step explanation:
∠2= (180°-36°)÷2 (base ∠s of isos. △)
∠2= 72°
m∠2= x +84
72= x +84
x= 72 -84
x= -12
Answer:
30 and 42
Hope this helps
Answer: A Explanation: First you have to write the model in an equation form. 6x+5=15 Subtract 5 from both sides 6x=10 Divide 6 from both sides X=10/6 Simplify X=5/3 or 1.67
Answer:
the chances are 5/11
Step-by-step explanation:
The problem simplified is 36√ 2abc