See explanation below.
Explanation:
The 'difference between roots and factors of an equation' is not a straightforward question. Let's define both to establish the link between the two..
Assume we have some function of a single variable
x
;
we'll call this
f
(
x
)
Then we can form an equation:
f
(
x
)
=
0
Then the "roots" of this equation are all the values of
x
that satisfy that equation. Remember that these values may be real and/or imaginary.
Now, up to this point we have not assumed anything about
f
x
)
. To consider factors, we now need to assume that
f
(
x
)
=
g
(
x
)
⋅
h
(
x
)
.
That is that
f
(
x
)
factorises into some functions
g
(
x
)
×
h
(
x
)
If we recall our equation:
f
(
x
)
=
0
Then we can now say that either
g
(
x
)
=
0
or
h
(
x
)
=
0
.. and thus show the link between the roots and factors of an equation.
[NB: A simple example of these general principles would be where
f
(
x
)
is a quadratic function that factorises into two linear factors.
Answer:
$6960
Step-by-step explanation:
p is not the principle. It is the principal.
I = prt
p = $6000
r = 8% = 0.08
t = 2
I = ($6000)(0.08)(2)
I = $960
Total amount after 2 years = principal + interest
Total amount = $6000 + $960
Total amount = $6960
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The only graph shown in the question doesn't have amplitude 1/2. look for a graph of a periodic wave function that has maximum y-value 1/2 (0.5) and minimum y-value 1/2 (0.5), or if it is not oscillating around the x-axis, verifies that the distance between minimum y-value and maximum y-value is "1" (one). This is because the amplitude is half of the peak-to-peak distance.
Look at the attached image as example.
Answer:
A.Graph B
Step-by-step explanation:
it decreases to a y of (0,-7) and then stays constant at -7
Hope this was helpful
If i was a tennis player playing in wimbledon i would break that rule ;-;
