Answer:
A. The children will be more likely to survive than if they did not have the trait.
Explanation:
Process of elimination
B. It will not affect the children.
Cannot be true, if it didn't impact the children then how would survival of the fittest work?
D. The children will be able to adapt if the environment changes.
That just... not how adapting works when it comes to evolution.
C. The children will be more likely to survive than their parents were
Everyone has the same trait, everyone is equal in that regard.
A. The children will be more likely to survive than if they did not have the trait.
"Suppose a pair of animals has a trait that helps them survive in their environment." The trait helps them survive. Not having the trait makes them less likely to survive. A is correct
Explanation:
a. 
→ ?
Removing common ions from both sides, we get the net ionic equation:
b. 
→
No precipitation is occuring.
c. 
→
Removing common ions from both sides, we get the net ionic equation:
d.
→
Removing common ions from both sides, we get the net ionic equation:
Answer:
0.0702J/g°C the specific heat capacity of the metal.
Explanation:m
where,
Q = heat absorbed by metal = 186.75 J
= Mass of metal= 19 g
= Initial temperature of metal = 
=Final temperature of metal = 
= specific heat of metal= ?
0.0702J/g°C the specific heat capacity of the metal.
Answer: option B. - A, B, D, E, C, H, F, G is correct using the principle of cross-cutting relationships.
The principle of cross-cutting relationships states that a fault or intrusion is younger than the rocks that it cuts through.
Explanation:
The full sequence of events is:
1. Layer A formed.
2. Layer B formed
3. Layer D formed.
4. Layer E formed
5. After layers A-B-D-E were present, intrusion C cut across all three.
6. Fault H formed, shifting rocks E through A and intrusion C.
7. Weathering and erosion created a layer of soil on top of layer F then G.
