Answer and Explanation:
A. Because plagiarism is a crime and contradicts an attorney's moral and ethical code. This takes away all the credibility of the lawyer, shows that he is not able to hold the position, in addition to showing that he acts in criminal activities of high gravity and therefore must be punished immediately and have his profession questioned.
B. The Iowa court referred to other cases involving plagiarism, which is the practice that allows someone else's works and words to be copied without due credit. Cases of plagiarism are very common and the Iowa court must treat everyone with the same severity in order for them to be fought.
Answer:
true
Explanation:
The section 1, article 5 of the constitution of the United States of America bears the Full faith and credit clause, which highlights that the states within the country have duty to respect the judicial proceedings, public acts and records of every other state. A continental congress committee reported in 1781 that one of the things required by this clause of the constitution is that the operation of the judicial proceedings and the act of one state’s court contravenes those of the other states where they are being declared.
I think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted is more appropriate.
<h3>Who is a Defendant?</h3>
This is referred to as the individual or group which have been accused of breaking the law and is being tried in court.
It is more appropriate for the defendants to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted because the jury will employ the use of evidences and testimonies in other to give a verdict. This ensures fair judgement and prevent innocent from being punished unjustly.
Read more about Defendant here brainly.com/question/7315287
#SPJ1
Answer:
Yes, Martha suffered a compensable loss.
Explanation:
