Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
A. because the line of best fit has to be at best fit between the points so is a good approximation of where all the points are heading when you try to predict something.
Answer:
y = 2/3x + 1 1/3
Step-by-step explanation:
Find the slope using rise over run, (y2 - y1) / (x2 - x1)
Plug in the points:
(y2 - y1) / (x2 - x1)
(2 - 0) / (1 + 2)
2 / 3
= 2/3
Then, plug in the slope and a point into y = mx + b to solve for b:
y = mx + b
2 = 2/3(1) + b
2 = 2/3 + b
1 1/3 = b
Plug in the slope and y intercept into y = mx + b
y = 2/3x + 1 1/3 is the equation of the line
By Euler's method the <em>numerical approximate</em> solution of the <em>definite</em> integral is 4.189 648.
<h3>How to estimate a definite integral by numerical methods</h3>
In this problem we must make use of Euler's method to estimate the upper bound of a <em>definite</em> integral. Euler's method is a <em>multi-step</em> method, related to Runge-Kutta methods, used to estimate <em>integral</em> values numerically. By integral theorems of calculus we know that definite integrals are defined as follows:
∫ f(x) dx = F(b) - F(a) (1)
The steps of Euler's method are summarized below:
- Define the function seen in the statement by the label f(x₀, y₀).
- Determine the different variables by the following formulas:
xₙ₊₁ = xₙ + (n + 1) · Δx (2)
yₙ₊₁ = yₙ + Δx · f(xₙ, yₙ) (3) - Find the integral.
The table for x, f(xₙ, yₙ) and y is shown in the image attached below. By direct subtraction we find that the <em>numerical</em> approximation of the <em>definite</em> integral is:
y(4) ≈ 4.189 648 - 0
y(4) ≈ 4.189 648
By Euler's method the <em>numerical approximate</em> solution of the <em>definite</em> integral is 4.189 648.
To learn more on Euler's method: brainly.com/question/16807646
#SPJ1
Width = 4ft
Length = 6ft
<u>Explanation:
</u>
Let length = l ,
So, width = 2l-8
Perimeter of rectangle = 2x(length + width)
According to the question,

Hence,
Width = 4ft
Length = 6ft