1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
igomit [66]
2 years ago
5

Broker A is involved in an exclusive right to sell listing with his seller client, Seller S. After receiving the property condit

ion disclosure form from Seller S, Mark hosts an open house to promote his new listing. At the open house a customer expresses concerns about radon levels in the area. Seller S did not indicate a radon problem on the property disclosure. What is Broker A's best course of action in this situation
Business
1 answer:
ale4655 [162]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

In such a scenario, it is recommended that Broker A should acknowledge the concerns of the customer because this is a material concern. They should then remind the customer that there exists a Property Disclosure Form which is made by the Seller that the customer is allowed to view to see if there is anything wrong with the house.

You as the broker, are acting on behalf of the seller so should not disclose any information than what is on the Property Disclosure Form.

If however, you know of a radon problem in the property in your personal capacity, the law requires that in the interest of safety, you reveal this to the customer if the seller did not disclose this in the form.

You might be interested in
Why is cvp analysis more difficult when using absorption costing than when using variable costing?.
laiz [17]

CVP analysis is more difficult because its requires costs to be broken down between variable and fixed which is not done in absorption costing.

<h3>What is a CVP analysis?</h3>

This is an analysis that find out how changes in the firm's variable and fixed costs affect the firm's profit.

Hence, the analysis is difficult when using absorption costing than when using variable costing because its requires costs to be broken down between variable and fixed which is not done in absorption costing.

Read more about CVP analysis

<em>brainly.com/question/26654564</em>

4 0
2 years ago
The invisible barrier that prevents women from advancing in the workplace is known as what?
dexar [7]
The gender divide because it’s not descriminatiob
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Joe and Rich are both considering investing in a project that costs $25,500 and is expected to produce cash inflows of $15,800 i
miv72 [106K]

Both Joe and Rich should accept this project.

D) Both Joe and Rich

<u>Explanation:</u>

NPVJoe= $25,500 + $15,800 / 1.085 + $15,300 / 1.085^2

NPVJoe= $2,058.88

NPVRich= –$25,500 + $15,800 / 1.125 + $15,300 / 1.125^2

NPVRich= $633.33

Here Joe and Rich both invested a total amount of $25,500 and they are expected to get cash inflows of $15,800 and $15,300 in the year 1 and year 2 respectively they both has their own different rates of return i.e. 8.5% and 12.5% so we can calculate the net principle value of Joe is $2,058.88 and that of Rich is $633.33.

8 0
3 years ago
Knowing your audience: Find an example of when a company or business did not listen to its customers. Investigate the case and e
geniusboy [140]

Answer:

E.g., Nokia did...

Customers made it clear to them that neither Windows phone nor Symbian will get anywhere near Android or iOS.

They resisted, ignored. They just flat out wanted the customers to adapt to their OS rather the other way around due to the absolute authority in the mobile phone market share.

As with any business which doesn't evolve as per the customer demands, the end was inevitable, and it was just a matter of time.

Brainliest me <3

8 0
3 years ago
The market rate of return is 12.65 percent and the risk-free rate is 3.1 percent. Galaxy Co. has 15 percent more systematic risk
Bess [88]

Answer:

11.18%

Explanation:

The firm average cost of equity is shown below:

Under Dividend growth, the common stock is

= dividend growth rate + dividend yield

= 3.75% + 4.53%

= 8.28%

Under CAPM, the common stock is

= Risk-free rate of return + Beta × (Market rate of return - risk-free rate of return)

=3.1% + 1.15 × (12.65% - 3.1%)

= 14.08%

Now the average cost of equity of the firm is

= (8.28% + 14.08%) ÷ 2

= 11.18%

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The method for providing solutions to union-management conflicts over interpretation or violation of a collective bargaining agr
    5·2 answers
  • Mary, a HR manager, is designing a training class for those working on the new cross-functional teams within her company. This c
    6·1 answer
  • What is the new fourth sector of the economy
    12·1 answer
  • Fama’s Llamas has a WACC of 9.7 percent. The company’s cost of equity is 12 percent, and its pretax cost of debt is 7.5 percent.
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following is true concerning the input validity goal in relation to the RAs in the B/AR/CR process? a. Failure to a
    15·1 answer
  • What do we mean when we talk about the "milky way" in our sky?
    5·1 answer
  • Zipcar’s goal is to have an available zipcar located within 10–15 minutes of its members. This is an example of what component o
    14·1 answer
  • Sal’s satellite company broadcasts TV to subscribers in Los Angeles and New York. The demand functions for each of these two gro
    9·1 answer
  • Using an end-of-period spreadsheet, the flow of accounting information moves from the a.financial statements to the adjusted tri
    7·1 answer
  • The adjusted trial balance of Sheri dan Company at December 31, 2022, includes the following accounts: Owner's Capital $16,000,
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!