Answer:
The third option
Step-by-step explanation:
first, you can eliminate the 2nd and the 4th option because the vertex of the graph is located at -3, and not 3. The reason it is not the 1st option is, because of the greater than or equal to sign, this inequality actually shows the white area.
Therefore, leaving the 3rd option. The y-intercept is correct, it is -3. The sign is also correct, because on the axis of the quadratic, -3 is the highest possible y-intercept. So y has to be less than or equal to -3.
Hope this helps! :D
Answer:
2)27
Step-by-step explanation:
18+3(3+5x)=15x+____
18+9+15x is still the same as 15x+____
so 27+15x is =15x+27
hope I helped mark as brainliest answer
Answer:
the client could expect a maximum loss of -0.054/year (-5,4%/year)
Step-by-step explanation:
since the 68-95-99.7 rule states that states probability that the anual return stays between 1 standard deviation from the mean is 68% , 2 standard deviations → 95% and 3 standard deviations → 99.7%
Then we are almost certain that the annual return will stay between 3 standard deviations from the mean.
Thus the most a client can loose is approximately at 3 standard deviations from the mean = 0.066 - 3*0.04 = -0.054 (-5,4%/year)
Answer: 15
Step-by-step explanation:
1+1
2+2
3+3
4+4
Answer: 72
Step-by-step explanation:
If all the sandwiches will have a slice of cheese, you just need to add up all of the sandwiches order (28 + 14 + 30 = 72)