You could subsitute g(x) for x in f(x) and if you get x as a result, then that is indeed the inverse
ex
if
f(x)=x-2
the inverse which is g(x) is
g(x)=x+2 because if you did
f(g(x)) then you would get
f(g(x))=(2+x)-2=2-2+x=x
Answer:
Check explanations for answer
Step-by-step explanation:
Here, we want to find out how Gerard came to the conclusion
For him to arrive at this conclusion, then we should consider the lengths given if they form a right triangle and are suitable for the building frame
From the lengths that we have
If we square the longest length, then the sum of the squares of the two other lengths should be the same as it is
This is in obedience to Pythagoras’ theorem
However, this does not hold
√(150)^2 is not equal to 8^2 + (√(95))^2)
and so since this does not work, then the triangle is not right-angled and cannot be use as the frame
Two less than the quotient of a number cubed and four, increased by eight
six times the difference of five and a number squared;
Answer: Yes, because the graphic is a straight line that passes the through the origin.
Step-by-step explanation: Ik the answer because I have the answer key.
-3/4, -7/10, 3/4, 8/10 is least to greatest
