<span>Environmental
deprivation is one in which there are no physical environmental
conditions that contribute to physical health and well-being.
Example 1: A child who lives in a "dangerous neighborhood" where he is constantly afraid.
Example
2: a child who lives in a situation of family overcrowding, many people
live with him and do not have his personal space or attention
</span><span>Various
investigations have shown that in the development of intelligence the
child needs to meet their basic needs, including environmental ones. <span>When the environment of the child is not conducive to cognitive development is altered.
</span></span>
I hope this information can help you.
<span><span /></span>
<span>The statement is "False".</span>
<span>John Gray
who was an American author wrote a book “</span><span>Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus”</span>. The book expresses that most regular
relationship issues among people are a consequence of mental contrasts between
the genders, which the writer embodies by methods for its eponymous
representation: that people are from particular planets, men from Mars and
ladies from Venus, and that each sex is accustomed to its own particular
planet's traditions, however not to those of the other. And this approach was not accepted by communication scholars.
Answer:
Semantic memory is the part of your long term memory which helps you remember words, concepts, and numerical values, which are all essential in understanding language.
Explanation:
Answer:
<em>The court is composed of a chief justice, assisted usually by six other judges, with seven additional judges in reserve; all are appointed by the king. </em>
Answer:
<em>I can see that there are no choices.</em>
fallacy of bandwagon
Explanation:
A "logical fallacy" refers to the error of reasoning or logical gap that makes an argument invalid.
The situation above commits the fallacy of the bandwagon because the argument is being supported only according to a significant number of population. This is a fallacy because it doesn't necessarily mean all of the retired persons are unhappy about the level of Social Security assistance due to the opinion of 30 persons who agreed that they were unhappy. It becomes a "standalone justification" of the validity of an argument. We cannot judge the happiness or unhappiness of all retired persons according only to a group of 30 persons <em>(even though they were chosen from different parts of the country). </em>
So, this explains the answer.
