I did because Britian refused to stop seizing Americans ships that traded with France- Britain's enemy in Europe
Answer:
The Supreme Court decision that decided the 2000 Presidential Election should go down in history as one of the court's most ill-conceived judgments. In issuing its poorly-reasoned ruling in Bush v. Gore, the court majority unnecessarily exposed itself to charges of partisanship and risked undermining the court's stature as an independent, impartial arbiter of the law. Although the court majority correctly identified constitutional problems in the specific recount proceedings ordered by the Florida Supreme Court, the decision to end all recount attempts did immeasurable damage to the equal protection rights the court claimed to be guarding, since it favored a convenient and timely tabulation of ballots over an accurate recording of the vote. In the controversy that followed this decision, some critics of the majority decision argued that the court had no business taking on Bush v. Gore in the first place, that it should have remained solely within the Florida courts (Ginsburg, J. [Dissent] Bush v. Gore [2000]). This paper will argue that the court was correct to intervene but that umm the resulting decision was flawed and inconsistent, with potentially serious, adverse implications for the Federal judiciary if the court continues to issue rulings in this way.
Explanation:
Answer
Provideed a moral reason to fight the war
Explanation:
Abraham Lincoln states explicitly, "all persons held as slaves within any State or designated part of a State, the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United States, shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free". He only freed the slaves in the confederate states of America, and formally tied the issue of slavery directly with the war.
Answer:
Slaves and crops.
Explanation:
The more land they had the more crops they could grow to earn money. And the more crops they grow they needed more slaves.
Brainliest please i need it to level up.
Considering the legacy of Napoleon, he was a tyrant, but he was also dedicated. He conquered most of Europe in the early 19th century. <span>He sold Louisiana in 1803 to the United States for $15 million. In 1805, <span>Napoleon achieved one of his greatest victories at the Battle of Austerlitz, in which his army defeated the Austrians and Russians. </span>But hi</span>s throne came to an end when he tried to invade Russia, which went very badly, in 1812. One might say he achieved a lot while a tyrant, and that is correct.
