Scientists can best use scientific argumentation to evaluate a scientific claim by developing a hypothesis that explains why the data support the claim (option A).
<h3>What is a hypothesis?</h3>
A hypothesis is a a tentative conjecture explaining an observation, phenomenon or scientific problem that can be tested by further observation, investigation and/or experimentation.
According to the scientific method, which is the method of discovering knowledge about the natural world based on making falsifiable predictions (hypotheses) and testing them empirically, the following are employed:
- Asking a question/Making an observation
- Constructing a hypothesis
- Testing the hypothesis
- Analyzing the data
- Making a conclusion
Therefore, scientists can best use scientific argumentation to evaluate a scientific claim by developing a hypothesis that explains why the data support the claim.
Learn more about hypothesis at: brainly.com/question/13025783
#SPJ1
Answer:
an example is that if your hot your brain would sense that and tell your sweat glands to sweat
Explanation:
Same for when it is cold, your brain senses that and tells you body to shiver and the hairs on your arm to stand up as well as goosebumps.
Magnesium would need 6 electrons to fill its outer shell.
Answer:
<em>Ecological succession</em>
Explanation:
Ecological succession can be described as a series of processes by which a climax community arises gradually in an area where there was no form of life before or the previous ecosystem was destroyed bu disasters such as fire, flood etc.
Ecological succession is of two types:
Primary succession occurs on lands where there was no form of life before. On the other hand, secondary succession occurs in lands where there was an ecosystem before which was destroyed.