Simple,
writing out the problem...

Simplify it...
-4x(6+5-1)
-4x(11-1)
-4x(10)
-40x
Making it look like...

Cancel out the common factors...
Thus making the answer:

.
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
i think thats the answer
Answer:
The answer is
.
Step-by-step explanation:
To solve the inequality, start by solving for the variable
.
To solve for the variable
, subtract
from both sides. The inequality will look like
.
Then, divide both sides by 6.5 in order to get the variable
by itself. The inequality answer will look like
.
Answer:


Step-by-step explanation:
One is given the following function:

One is asked to evaluate the function for
, substitute
in place of
, and simplify to evaluate:



A recursive formula is another method used to represent the formula of a sequence such that each term is expressed as a function of the last term in the sequence. In this case, one is asked to find the recursive formula of an arithmetic sequence: that is, a sequence of numbers where the difference between any two consecutive terms is constant. The following general formula is used to represent the recursive formula of an arithmetic sequence:

Where (
) is the evaluator term (
) represents the term before the evaluator term, and (d) represents the common difference (the result attained from subtracting two consecutive terms). In this case (and in the case for most arithmetic sequences), the common difference can be found in the standard formula of the function. It is the coefficient of the variable (n) or the input variable. Substitute this into the recursive formula, then rewrite the recursive formula such that it suits the needs of the given problem,



Answer:
The solution can be defined as follows:
Step-by-step explanation:
They also have a significant outcome in our instance. Its value of F is 1.773, with such a p-value of 0.212 achieved meaning (which is greater than the .05 alpha level). It means that the press with different levels of stress of the stress variable may not differentiate objectively.
Even so, we still do not know which one of the multiple mechanisms is significant. They realize the diff. To do just that, the results of the Tukey HSD test should be regarded.
HSD Tukey
Looking at the Multiple Correlations table below, you will see that mean values were created for the standard deviation among pairs of various stress varying concentrations (High - Low; High - Medium )
This can be seen on one-way ANOVA(1.773, p=.212), there's no statistically significant difference between the groups. A Tukey post hoc study has observed that the increase among medium and high stress is statistically significant, as well as the difference among low, medium, and high stress is important.