<span>The Public Works programs were highly effective in helping to end the Depression, as they employed people, thus allowing them to buy manufactured goods, which in turn increased manufacturing companies confidence and willingness to invest. This willingness to invest would in turn result in either making more products or creating new products, thus creating jobs to make these products, employing more people and in turn allowing them to buy more manufactured products. This cycle would continue until investment and personal expenditures leveled out at a equilibrium that was higher than before the Public Works programs were implemented.</span>
Two changes, related to formal communication, that would provide benefit for Walmart can be downward communication and diagonal communication.
Formal communication follows a proper channel of communication in official or other such formal environments. This type of chain follows a set of rules set by the organization.
Downward communication refers to communication happening from the management level to the subordinate level. People in top organizational posts talk to people at lower levels. At Walmart, this can be done to result in a better clarification of the employee expectations as well as the kind of work employees are supposed to give.
Diagonal communication is when employees of one department engage with employees of another department and communicate with each other irrespective of the chain of command. This way they can learn and understand the processes in different departments and may be implement a few to benefit from it.
To learn more about formal communication, click
brainly.com/question/11896648
#SPJ4
Correct answer choice is:
D.Reza Pahlavi.
____________________________________________________________
Explanation:
On the night of the Anglo-Soviet incursion of Iran in the Second World War, Sir Reader Bullard, the British minister in Tehran, proposed on his state the desirability of eliminating the Iranian leader, Reza Shah, from the appointment. Association with the ‘extensively despised’ shah, whom he characterized as a ‘selfish uneducated bully’, was harmful to Britain's concerns and its war application. In the weeks that comprehended the Anglo-Soviet invasion of Iran, Bullard stayed to push for and to develop the final British declaration to attack Reza Shah to withdraw and go into deportation. Yet, this was not forever Bullard's opinion of Britain's association with the Iranian leader. When he manifested his credentials 20 months ahead, Bullard reported it as his ‘primary responsibility’ to win Reza Shah's support. Nor did Bullard's emphasis that Britain removes the Shah originally find courtesy with the Foreign Secretary, Anthony Eden, his Middle East workers at the Foreign Office, or with Churchill.
The answer is 1/3 so I hope this was helpful
