1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
KengaRu [80]
3 years ago
8

Question: Did the President and Congress go beyond their war powers by implementing exclusion and

Law
1 answer:
Tom [10]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Yes the government did

Explanation:

just because they have a Japanese descent doesn't mean they are also bad, for example, i can't say all boys are bad because one of them was mean

You might be interested in
Distinguish between the factors in a case that make it a civil or criminal case
jeka57 [31]

Answer:

civil would be a lawsuit, ex you trip and fall at work and they didnt put a sign up saying its slippery, criminal is a crime such as murd3r, rap3, ars0n, and other crimes

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Must all elements of probable cause exist before a lawful arrest can be made?
kkurt [141]

householdThereWhichever,

Probable cause is a requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that must usually be met before the police make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant.

“Probable cause” is a legal standard applied to the police and prosecutors; individual citizens don’t “get” probable cause.

Police must demonstrate sufficient probable cause to believe that there is evidence of a crime to obtain a search warrant or an arrest warrant.

Prosecutors must demonstrate sufficient probable cause as to every element of a charged crime to proceed with filing charges and beginning the trial process.

There is no clear legal definition of what constitutes “probable cause” — it’s somewhere between suspicion and proof. The closest you’ll come is the 1949 case Brinegar v. the United States in which the Supreme Court described it thus:

“…where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge, and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to warrant a belief by a man of reasonable caution that a crime is being committed.”

Please imagine a situation when someone very healthy falls ill all of a sudden and the reason is not immediately known. You take that person to a doctor and the doctor will ask you to identify the root cause of the illness, generally as under:

type of food the person ate recently

what liquids he/she consumed

whether he/she traveled recently and had food from outside,

whether affected by climate change,

whether any drastic change in his/her daily routine etc.

any other likely change in his/her work schedule

The above list could be the probable causes from which the doctor can identify the root cause for the illness.

II. Similarly, when an inexplicable accident happens(the driver cannot find out the cause), several questions like the following may be asked:

was there break failure

did one of the tires burst

was the driver distracted by someone(suddenly crossing the road etc.)

did the driver doze off(sleep for a while)

The above can be considered as the probable causes, to arrive at the root cause of the accident.

This is cause and this is the effect is a highly scientific approach and it is hardly possible in less than 1% of our day-to-day life despite our 99% dependence on only science-originated things. It is a decision without measurements, proper logic errors, etc., we are forced to land in probability and possibility. Maximum experience is in medical decisions, especially in new upcoming nuisance topics like a corona. Only probable cause is guessed. There is nothing when a patient comes with corona. Whichever is the cause treat him with your best tools as a doctor? Those who work in huge projects of prevention, curtailing, “stop-the-spread” projects will break their heads.

A simple example from a household happening. The jewel kept on a chair just temporarily is missing. 1. Somebody should have kept it safely 2. Somebody should have pocketed it on a non-returnable basis 3. The servants should have taken full benefit of our negligence and we should start searching for what more is stolen 4. The jeweler whom we told that we have some repair work should have come and taken it for repair, we telephone and find out. 5. Government announced gold control when Morarji was P.M. Some excise officer should have read it now, noticed our careless and taken it.

Which out of these is most probable?

Nothing! The jewel was under the cushion of the chair.

Two servants were dismissed forever. There is no excise department connection with that jewel. Nobody can keep it more safely than what the jewel can keep its good self. That jeweler has left the city two years ago.

All guesswork done is included in only probable causes, many cause foolish. Some are probable. But the actual happening has not chosen that. It is the house that has chosen those causes. The scientific or guess ability of the house is clear to them at least.

Probable cause is a guesswork cause that may be or may not be tallying with the truth. The correct guess is 100% probable!

The jewel missing cause is 0% probable!

6 0
2 years ago
Chester is renting an apartment, and he has a problem. All night he hears the scurrying of rodents, and each morning he finds ce
USPshnik [31]

Answer:

Habitability

Explanation:

When someone becomes a landlord, they are taking on a lot of responsibilities when it comes to the law. This is due to the fact that a tenant should be able to hold a landlord accountable. One of the most important duties that a tenant needs to fulfill is that of providing a livable, safe, clean place to live. This is called "warranty of habitability." This includes the public areas of the building a tenant is renting. In this case, Chester's landlord is breaching Chester's right to habitability by not ensuring that the place is clean and safe to live in.

7 0
3 years ago
Liquidity is something of value that you own. True O False​
ahrayia [7]

I think its true I hope it is correct

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why does soft money tend to exert more influence in elections than hard money? a.Soft money can only be used for ads that are no
zheka24 [161]

Answer:

C, i may be wrong but if not can i have brainliest... much appreciated

Explanation:

Hard money refers to coins, while soft money refers to paper currency. But the terms also have a role in politics. They are used to refer to political contributions in the United States.

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • In this activity, you'll be writing an essay evaluating the reasoning of the Supreme Court majority opinion and dissent in the c
    13·1 answer
  • New friends? I’m 14 and I like to play games I’ll just add you on snap or what ever you have.
    11·1 answer
  • How can citizens participate in the Government in madagascar?
    15·1 answer
  • Which of these is an example of a land-use law?
    6·1 answer
  • Which nonuniformed law enforcement officer conducts interviews, examines
    15·1 answer
  • Miguel is in charge of Isolating the crime scene. What is the MOST accurate reason this job so important?
    12·1 answer
  • If a 10-Year Term Life policy contains a Renewability provision, the policy will renew
    14·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ME!!!!!!!!!!!!
    13·1 answer
  • If I have disturbed the neighbours, can the landlord hand me an N5 form and evict me right
    9·1 answer
  • A scientific ___law__ is a statement that explains what always happens under very specific conditions.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!