Answer: B: Offenders engage in direct forms of violence.
Explanation: According to the Britanica Encyclopedia "White-collar crime, crime committed by persons who, often by virtue of their occupations, exploit social, economic, or technological power for personal or corporate gain". White collar crimes tends to refer to a crime committed by a bussinessman or bussinesswoman who are more likely to be middle aged or older usually by persons from the middle class and sometimes but not very often the lower class. Fraud, money laundering, stealing company funds and embezzlment are considered white collar crimes. It is often seen as less serious when compared to other crimes because it does not involve physical violence. Public order crimes are not associated to white collar crimes. Financal gain is the ulterior motive of white collar crimes.
White-collar crime have been associated with the educated and affluent ever since the term was first coined in 1949 by sociologist Edwin Sutherland, who defined it as "crime committed by a person of respectability and high social status in the course of their occupation", however, these crimes have ceased to be exclusive to such groups.
Answer:
The correct answer choice to the question: What is a difference between a PAC and a super PAC, would be: PACs can contribute directly to candidates, but super PACs cannot.
Explanation:
PACs are generally known as political action committees and their direct purpose is to become an organization that receives donations and funds from members and supporters and directly play a role in a candidate´s campaign, a ballot, or a lawmaking process. However, PACs were placed under limitations as to how much money they could receive, and the sources of it, specifically corporations and labor unions, because they have direct impact on campaigns. In order to resolve that issue, super PACs, better known as independent-expenditure only committees, can receive unlimited funds from corporations and labor unions, as well as members, but these cannot go to impact a campaign. They can work with those funds in other ways, but not to impact a campaign, a ballot, or a lawmaking process.
Answer: Insufficient external justification; more dissonance
Explanation:
insufficient justification effect:
Describes that in some cases people will go against their own person belief in order to partake in a particular action of behaviour because there is a promise of a small reward versus large reward but reject an activity if it associated with a mild threat versus a sever threat.
Insufficient external justification occurs when a person doesn't have enough justification why they couldn't do something they desired to do.
Cognitive dissonance defines the conflict that exist within someone as they struggle with whether to get involved with the behaviour that goes against their beliefs or attitudes and they may mentally try to adjust their attitudes, behaviour or beliefs in order to establish balance.
a solider will have that feeling
Answer:
The answer is "roles"
Explanation:
Rolling standards can be seen as anticipated behavior or characteristics of the occupation of the position. It is also seen as an enforced, as actions.
- Perceptions of implicit behavior must be assumed, like self-reporting, etc.
- The roles define an inappropriate behavior for the occupant of status, that's why it is important.
