Answer: option c
Explanation:
Avoid/withdraw is never an option of conflict, conflict will always happen in projects because people always have a better way to do things in terms of project ,but we always have a boss that says other wise. Since conflict will always happen in projects ,the best thing to do is to are also stated in the options above except option c were withdraw from a conflict and avoid will definitely affect the project team and project it self ,the best way to manage a conflict is not by avoiding or withdrawing ,it is by collaborating and tackling the problem so that the project and be progressive
<span>Point source: Any single identifiable source of pollution from which pollutants are discharged.
such as a pipe, ditch, ship or factory smokestack</span>
i believe the answer would be polyandry
Answer:6-b, 7-a
Explanation: they fit the best and i've taken these classes before lol
You might be surprised to find, however, that the first seismometer was invented in China in 132 AD by a Chinese astronomer, mathematician, engineer, and inventor called Zhang Heng. The instrument was said to resemble a wine jar six feet in diameter, with eight dragons positioned face down along the outside of the barrel, marking the primary compass directions. In each dragon’s mouth was a small bronze ball. Beneath the dragons sat eight bronze toads, with their broad mouths gaping to receive the balls. When the instrument sensed an incoming seismic wave, one of the balls would drop and the sound would alert observers to the earthquake, giving a rough indication of the earthquake’s direction of origin. The device is said to have been very accurate and could detect earthquakes from afar, and did not rely on shaking or movement in the location where the instrument was positioned. The first ever earthquake recorded by this seismograph was supposedly somewhere in the east. Days later, a rider from there reported this earthquake. Moreover, it had the most wicked ornaments. They don’t make scientific instruments like they used to! Of course, the insides of the seismometer was filled with a sensing mechanism of some sort, the contents of which have been lost in time. In all likelihood, a simple or inverted pendulum was employed, according to experts.
