All categories

2 years ago

3(x - 2) - (1 - x) > 2x - 7

Mathematics

1 answer:

Kipish [7]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

a square meters are a rectangle is the place where the people who cares about their own business is not a rectangle is a rectangle is a rectangle is a square and the area is not the only thing to the most of the time that you have been doing this and that is the only thing I have been doing with the past few years I've had to do it myself for

You might be interested in

6x + -2y² + 4xy² + 3x² + 5xy² simplify it

r-ruslan [8.4K]

$\large\displaystyle\text{$\begin{gathered}\sf 6x+-2y^{2}+4xy^{2}+3x^{2} +5xy^{2} \end{gathered}$}$

$\large\displaystyle\text{$\begin{gathered}\sf Group\:like\:terms \end{gathered}$}$

$\large\displaystyle\text{$\begin{gathered}\sf =3x^2+6x-2y^2+4xy^2+5xy^2 \end{gathered}$}$

$\large\displaystyle\text{$\begin{gathered}\sf Sum\:similar\:elements:\:4xy^2+5xy^2=9xy^2 \end{gathered}$}$

$\boxed{\large\displaystyle\text{$\begin{gathered}\sf 3x^2+6x-2y^2+9xy^2 \end{gathered}$} }$

7 0

1 year ago

Read 2 more answers

Which series of transformations will not map figure Q onto itself? (x + 2, y − 2), reflection over y = x − 1 (x − 2, y + 2), ref

raketka [301]

b Step-by-step explanation:

this is super easy

7 0

2 years ago

Evaluate: 6q + m − m; use m = 8, and q = 3

adelina 88 [10]

Answer:

your answer is 18

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Riley used a drawing to divide . He made groups of 12 with 1 left over. Hoy many groups did he make?

Yakvenalex [24]

Step-by-step explanation:

Here important information is missing. That is total number of divide.

However, it is given that riley made groups of 12 with 1left over from total number of divide. So, total number of divides on the drawing must be a multiple of 12 +1. It can be any number like 12n+1, where n is an integer. Then we ca find total number of group.

5 0

2 years ago

Does the point given below occur on the line shown. Can you show the work please

Aneli [31]

No it doesn't. 2*0.5 + 5*0 = 1, not 19

5 0

3 years ago