Answer:
Part 1: W = 116 Y = 163
Part 2: Since 232 is the mailing point of 2 kg then you would divide 232 by 2 to get the melting point for 1 kg, the same with Y.
Ksp of copper(II) hydroxide Cu(OH)2 is 4.9 x 10-8.
Chemical reaction (dissociation) of copper(II) hydroxide in water:
Cu(OH)2(s) → Cu²⁺(aq) + 2OH⁻(aq).
Ksp(Cu(OH)2) = [Cu²⁺]·[OH⁻]².
[Cu²⁺] = 2.42 x 10-3 mol/l; solubility od copper ions
[OH⁻] = 2[Cu²⁺] = 2 x 2.42 x 10-3 mol/l
[OH⁻] = 4.48 x 10-3 mol/l; solubility of hydroxide ions
Ksp = 2.42 x 10-3 mol/l x (4.48 x 10-3 mol/l)²
Ksp = 4.9 x 10-8
Ksp is the solubility product constant for a solid substance dissolving in an aqueous solution.
Solubility of the compound depends on the temperature of the solution and the structure of that compound.
More info about: brainly.com/question/23946616
#SPJ4
I believe the answer is volatile!
Answer: The distance is slightly less than 3.5 m
Explanation: assuming wall and target are the same thing, and the bullet has constant velocity, the bullet will travel 7 m in half a second, so half that distance is 3.5 m.
In reality, the bullet is decelerating (at an unknown rate) so the distance is slightly less than 3.5 m.
There is also a vertical velocity component, which means it hits the target/wall at an angle. The trajectory is such that it hits the wall above the shooter because the ricochet hits at ~the level at which it left the firearm.
If the wall was absent, the bullet would have described a parabola which brough it back to the initial level after 7m. This could be calculated, but it means that the actual distance between the shooter and the wall is slightly less than 3.5 m
In addition, the collision with the wall is not 100% elastic, so the velocity aftercthe ricochetvis further reduced.
A calculation would be complex because these confounding factors are not completely independent of each other, but all reduce the average velocity and therefore the distance.
Therefore it is only possible to say that the distance was somewhat less than 3.5 m
Answer:
Specific heat is defined by the amount of heat needed to raise the temperature of 1 gram of a substance 1 degree Celsius (°C). Water has a high specific heat capacity which we'll refer to as simply "heat capacity", meaning it takes more energy to increase the temperature of water compared to other substances.
Explanation:
