(vii) log32 8=m Again please

Mathematics

1 answer:

KonstantinChe [14]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

log_(32)8= 3/5

Step-by-step explanation:

Log_(32)8 = m

write is as

32^m=8

(2^5)^m = 2^3

2^5m = 2^3

Since the bases are the same, then two expressions are only equal if the exponents are also equal.

5m = 3

divide 5 on both sides to remove it from m

m= 3/5

Hope this helps!

You might be interested in

<img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%7B9%7D%5E%7B2%7D%20-%202%281%20%2B%203%29" id="TexFormula1" title=" {9}^{2} - 2(1 + 3)" al

Dmitrij [34]

The answer is 73 because you solve 9^ 2 which is 81 then multiply 2 times 4 which is 8 then subtract 81 and 8 which is 73

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Ex 7) Imagine a mile-long bar of metal such as the rail along railroad tracks. Suppose that the rail is anchored on both ends an

Fantom [35]

9514 1404 393

Answer:

about 44.5 feet

Step-by-step explanation:

We can write relations for the height of the rail as a function of initial length and expanded length, but the solution cannot be found algebraically. A graphical solution or iterative solution is possible.

Referring to the figure in the second attachment, we can write a relation between the angle value α and the height of the circular arc as ...

h = c·tan(α) . . . . . . where c = half the initial rail length

Then the length of the expanded rail is ...

s = r(2α) = (c/sin(2α)(2α) . . . . . . where s = half the expanded rail length

Rearranging this last equation, we have ...

sin(2α)/(2α) = c/s

It is this equation that must be solved iteratively. We find the solution to be ...

α ≈ 0.0168538794049 radians

So, the height of the circular arc is ...

h = 2640.5·tan(0.0168538794049) ≈ 44.4984550191 . . . feet

The rail will bow upward by about 44.5 feet.

_____

<em>Additional comments</em>

Note that s and c in the diagram are half the lengths of the arc and the chord, respectively. The ratio of half-lengths is the same as the ratio of full lengths: c/s = 2640/2640.5 = 5280/5281.

We don't know the precise shape the arc will take, but we suspect is is not a circular arc. It seems likely to be a catenary, or something similar.

We used Newton's method iteration to refine the estimate of the angle from that shown on the graph. The iterator used is x' = x -f(x)/f'(x), where x' is the next guess based on the previous guess of x. Only a few iterations are required obtain an angle value to full calculator precision.