The three concerns that the residents of this area might be:
1) <span>The cost of not moving forward is extremely high, so they opposed the plan, as they think it would affect US economy
2) </span><span>Nuclear waste disposal capability is an environmental imperative, so their environment would be polluted by very radioactive materials.
3) </span>Demand for new nuclear plants also demands disposal capability which supports national security but again, their site will be no longer for them. But unfortunately, <span>Extensive studies consistently show Yucca Mountain to be a sound site for nuclear waste disposal so the plan can't be abolished.
Hope this helps!</span>
Answer:
1.
643.21g 1 mol 6.022^23
262.87 g 1 mol
= 1.4735E24 [Mg3(PO4)2]
2.
4.061x10^24 1mol 22.4 (L)
6.022^23 1mol
= 151 liters H2O2
3.
479.3g 1 mol 6.022^23
18.02g 1mol
= 1.60E25 H20 atoms
4.
80.34L 1mol 164.1
22.4L 1mol
588.6g Ca(NO3)2
5.
893.7g 1mol 22.4
44.01g 1mol
= 427 L CO2 or 427.4
6.
5.39 x 10^25 1mol 78.01
6.022^23 1mol
= 6980g Al(OH)3
hope this helps!! :)
<span>0.310 moles
First, look up the atomic weights of the elements involved.
Atomic weight carbon = 12.0107
Atomic weight hydrogen = 1.00794
Atomic weight sulfur = 32.065
Molar mass (C3H5)2S = 6 * 12.0107 + 10 * 1.00794 + 32.065
= 114.2086 g/mol
Moles (C3H5)2S = 35.4 g / 114.2086 g/mol = 0.309959145 mol
Since there's just one sulfur atom per (C3H5)2S molecule, the number of moles of sulfur will match the number of moles of (C3H5)2S which is 0.310 when rounded to 3 significant digits.</span>
Answer:
51.66 mol H2O (steam)
Explanation:
5.74 mol C3H18 x 18 mol H2O/ 2 mol C3H18 = 51.66 mol H2O (steam)