Answer:
d. it causes profits to be understated when prices are rising and allows a company to dodge taxes.
Explanation:
The LIFO method should not be permitted to determine the net income as in this case the profits would be understated at the time when price is increased due to this it permits the company to dodge taxes as the inventory consumed in the production process also the high inventory value would be involved in the cost of sales that represent the high cost, this result in lower profits and taxes
Hence, the option d is correct
Answer:
The correct answer is d) neither the long-run Phillips curve nor the Classical dichotomy.
Explanation:
The answer that best suits the situation described is the Phillips curve in the short term but not in the long term.
The Phillips curve starts from the principle that the amount of money circulating (commonly called "money supply") has real effects on the economy in the short term. In this way, an increase in the money supply would have a beneficial effect on aggregate demand, as citizens will spend more when their nominal wages are increased (known as “monetary illusion”) and a more favorable framework for investment and investment will be created. that the prospects of rising prices will improve the expectations of corporate profits. The improvement in aggregate demand would result in greater economic growth, and this in turn in the creation of new jobs. This is how an inverse relationship between inflation and unemployment is established, expressed graphically by a downward curve.
Answer:
They should operate Mine 1 for 1 hour and Mine 2 for 3 hours to meet the contractual obligations and minimize cost.
Explanation:
The formulation of the linear programming is:
Objective function:
![C=200M_1+160M_2](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=C%3D200M_1%2B160M_2)
Restrictions:
- High-grade ore: ![6M_1+2M_2\geq12](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=6M_1%2B2M_2%5Cgeq12)
- Medium-grade ore: ![2M_1+2M_2\geq8](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=2M_1%2B2M_2%5Cgeq8)
- Low-grade ore: ![4M_1+12M_2\geq24](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=4M_1%2B12M_2%5Cgeq24)
- No negative hours: ![M_1,M_2\geq0](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=M_1%2CM_2%5Cgeq0)
We start graphing the restrictions in a M1-M2 plane.
In the figure attached, we have the feasible region, where all the restrictions are validated, and the four points of intersection of 2 restrictions.
In one of this four points lies the minimum cost.
Graphically, we can graph the cost function over this feasible region, with different cost levels. When the line cost intersects one of the four points with the lowest level of cost, this is the optimum combination.
(NOTE: it is best to start with a low guessing of the cost and going up until it reaches one point in the feasible region).
The solution is for the point (M1=1, M2=3), with a cost of C=$680.
The cost function graph is attached.
Answer:
The correct answer will be "Expatriate".
Explanation:
- An expatriate seems to be a migrant worker through his or her occupation, a specialist, or maybe even a skilled worker.
- Expatriate managers could've been characterized because of those who aren’t residents including its country during which individuals work, and were employed because of everyone's specialized operational skills but rather because of about there willingness to employ organization knowledge.
Answer:
$17,000
Explanation:
Leker's Old Property Adjusted Tax Basis = $20,000
To calculate the new basis, subtract the $3000 recieved in cash from the new property.
New Tax Basis; $20,000-$3,000= $17,000
The transaction of Leker to exchange a real property for another led to a loss: Meaning a Property of $20,000 was exchanged for a property of $10,000+ $3,000 (cash)= $13,000
The Loss on the transaction= $20,000- $13,000= $7,000
Due to the loss no gain is recognized and the $3000 will reduce the basis for his new asset.