1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
harkovskaia [24]
3 years ago
10

PLEASE HELP!! (I will mark brainiest) (REAL ANSWERS ONLY PLEASE!)

Chemistry
2 answers:
Inessa [10]3 years ago
8 0

The phosphate group of one nucleotide bonds covalently with the sugar molecule of the next nucleotide, and so on, forming a long polymer of nucleotide monomers. The sugar–phosphate groups line up in a “backbone” for each single strand of DNA, and the nucleotide bases stick out from this backbone. The carbon atoms of the five-carbon sugar are numbered clockwise from the oxygen as 1′, 2′, 3′, 4′, and 5′ (1′ is read as “one prime”). The phosphate group is attached to the 5′ carbon of one nucleotide and the 3′ carbon of the next nucleotide. In its natural state, each DNA molecule is actually composed of two single strands held together along their length with hydrogen bonds between the bases.

Stells [14]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Explanation:

The discovery that DNA is the prime genetic molecule, carrying all the hereditary information within chromosomes, immediately focused attention on its structure. It was hoped that knowledge

of the structure would reveal how DNA carries the genetic messages that are replicated when chromosomes divide to produce two identical copies of themselves. During the late 1940s and early 1950s, several research groups in the United States and in Europe engaged in serious efforts—both cooperative and rival—to understand how the atoms of DNA are linked together by covalent bonds and how the resulting molecules are arranged in three-dimensional space. Not surprisingly, there initially were fears that DNA might have very complicated and perhaps bizarre structures that differed radically from one gene to another. Great relief, if not general elation, was thus expressed when the fundamental DNA structure was found to be the double helix. It told us that all genes have roughly the same three-dimensional form and that the differences between two genes reside in the order and number of their four nucleotide building blocks along the complementary strands.

Now, some 50 years after the discovery of the double helix, this simple description of the genetic material remains true and has not had to be ap- preciably altered to accommodate new findings. Nevertheless, we have come to realize that the structure of DNA is not quite as uniform as was first thought. For example, the chromosome of some small viruses have single-stranded, not double-stranded, molecules. Moreover, the precise orientation of the base pairs varies slightly from base pair to base pair in a manner that is influenced by the local DNA sequence. Some DNA se- quences even permit the double helix to twist in the left-handed sense, as opposed to the right-handed sense originally formulated for DNA’s general structure. And while some DNA molecules are linear, others are circular. Still additional complexity comes from the supercoiling (further twisting) of the double helix, often around cores of DNA-binding proteins.

Likewise, we now realize that RNA, which at first glance appears to be very similar to DNA, has its own distinctive structural features. It is principally found as a single-stranded molecule. Yet by means of intra-strand base pairing, RNA exhibits extensive double-helical character and is capable of folding into a wealth of diverse tertiary structures. These structures are full of surprises, such as non-classical base pairs, base-backbone interactions, and knot-like configurations. Most remarkable of all, and of profound evolutionary significance, some RNA molecules are enzymes that carry out reactions that are at the core of information transfer from nucleic acid to protein.

Clearly, the structures of DNA and RNA are richer and more intricate than was at first appreciated. Indeed, there is no one generic structure for DNA and RNA. As we shall see in this chapter, there are in fact vari- ations on common themes of structure that arise from the unique physi- cal, chemical, and topological properties of the polynucleotide chain

You might be interested in
Logan is cooking, and he wants to increase the boiling point of the water. Which solute would not be a good choice as it would n
Mars2501 [29]
Sugar would not increase the boiling point of the water as much as the others.To show this, we recall the equation for boiling point elevation ∆t:  
     ∆t = i Kb m 

The difference in these four solutions will be in the product of the van't Hoff Factor i and molality m: i * m. 

If we assume that we have 0.1m of each solute, the products i*m for these solutions are:
     
     Solution                      Identity of particles                          i      i * m
        0.1 m NaCl                 Na+, Cl-                                         2     2 * 0.1 = 0.2
        0.1 m MgSO4             Mg^2+, SO4^2-                            2     2 * 0.1 = 0.2
        0.1 m K2SO4              two K+, SO4^2-                           3     3 * 0.1 = 0.3
        0.1 m C12H22O11      covalently bonded molecules     1     1 * 0.1 = 0.1

Therefore, having the lowest  i * m, sucrose will have the lowest boiling point elevation.
8 0
3 years ago
How many significant figures does 6559.060 have
UNO [17]
<span>significant figures: 7, decimals: 3</span>
5 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP
morpeh [17]
<span>conductor because it conducts the electrons</span><span />
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why would a metal house not be a good idea in Florida or Alaska?
dolphi86 [110]
It wouldn’t be a good idea bc metal absorbs the weather around it. so in florida it would be too hot and in alaska it would be too cold!
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Estimate your de Broglie wavelength when you are running. (For this problem use h = 10^−34 in SI units and 1 lb is equivalent to
AlekseyPX

Answer:

A. your running speed 1.5 m/s

B. your mass 70 kg

C. your de Broglie wavelength 6.32x10^{-36}m

Explanation:

Hello there!

In this case, since the equation for the calculation of the Broglie wavelength is:

\lambda =\frac{h}{m*v}

We can assume a running speed of about 1.5 m/s and a mass of 70 kg, so the resulting Broglie wavelength is:

\lambda =\frac{6.626x10^{-34}kg\frac{m}{s} }{70kg*1.5\frac{m}{s} }\\\\\lambda =6.32x10^-36m

Best regards!

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • __S8 + __ O2 → ___SO3
    7·1 answer
  • It takes 208.4 kJ of energy to remove 1 mole of electrons from 1 mole of atoms on the surface of rubidium metal. How much energy
    15·1 answer
  • For the following questions, use a periodic table and your atomic calculations to find the unknown information about each isotop
    7·1 answer
  • A flask contains a gas mixture of hydrogen and nitrogen. The total pressure of the mix is 2.0 atm. The partial pressure of the h
    5·1 answer
  • Which substance can not be decomposed by a chemical change?
    6·2 answers
  • Which of these energy resources does NOT pollute when used?
    8·1 answer
  • When the water in the ocean goes back into the sky what is it called?
    13·2 answers
  • Calculate the density of a sample with a mass of 31.6g and a volume of 9.5mL include units in your final answer
    7·1 answer
  • Having the same number of protons and electrons results in a positively charged atom.
    6·1 answer
  • Control rods in a nuclear reactor...
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!