All categories

2 years ago

Clark bought a 3.2 Ib bag of potatoes , which had 10 potatoes. How many potatoes would there be in a 10 Ib bag?

Mathematics

1 answer:

timurjin [86]2 years ago

5 0

9514 1404 393

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

If we assume the number of potatoes is proportional to the weight, then we can write the equation ...

n/10 = 10/3.2

n = 100/3.2 = 31.25 . . . . . . . multiply by 10

There may be 31 potatoes in a 10-lb bag.

You might be interested in

Mass of Weight(C)

Stolb23 [73]

I hope this helps
A.1,512

3 0

2 years ago

A data mining routine has been applied to a transaction dataset and has classified 88 records as fraudulent (30 correctly so) an

chubhunter [2.5K]

Answer:

The classification matrix is attached below

Part a

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is 65.91%.

Part b

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is 96.64%

Step-by-step explanation:

The classification matrix is obtained as shown below:

The transaction dataset has 30 fraudulent correctly classified records out of 88 records, that is, 30 records are correctly predicted given that an instance is negative.

Also, there would be 88 - 30 = 58 non-fraudulent incorrectly classified records, that is, 58 records are incorrectly predicted given that an instance is positive.

The transaction dataset has 920 non-fraudulent correctly classified records out of 952 records, that is, 920 records are correctly predicted given that an instance is positive.

Also, there would be 952 - 920 = 32 fraudulent incorrectly classified records, that is, 32 records incorrectly predicted given that an instance is negative.

That is,

Predicted value

Active value Fraudulent Non-fraudulent

Fraudlent 30 58

non-fraudulent 32 920

The classification matrix is obtained by using the information related to the transaction data, which is classified into fraudulent records and non-fraudulent records.

The error rate is obtained as shown below:

The error rate is obtained by taking the ratio of $\left( {b + c} \right)(b+c)$ and the total number of records.

The classification matrix is, shown above

The total number of records is, $30 + 58 + 32 + 920 = 1,040$

The error rate is,

$\begin{array}{c}\\{\rm{Error}}\,{\rm{rate}} = \frac{{b + c}}{{{\rm{Total}}}}\\\\ = \frac{{58 + 32}}{{1,040}}\\\\ = \frac{{90}}{{1,040}}\\\\ = 0.0865\\\end{array}$

The percentage is $0.0865 \times 100 = 8.65$

(a)

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is obtained by taking the rate ratio of b and $\left( {a + b} \right)(a+b)$ .

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is obtained as shown below:

The classification matrix is, shown above and in the attachment

The error rate for truly fraudulent is,

$\begin{array}{c}\\FP = \frac{b}{{a + b}}\\\\ = \frac{{58}}{{30 + 58}}\\\\ = \frac{{58}}{{88}}\\\\ = 0.6591\\\end{array}$

The percentage is, $0.6591 \times 100 = 65.91$

(b)

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is obtained by taking the ratio of d and $\left( {c + d} \right)(c+d)$ .

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is obtained as shown below:

The classification matrix is, shown in the attachment

The error rate for truly non-fraudulent is,

$\begin{array}{c}\\TP = \frac{d}{{c + d}}\\\\ = \frac{{920}}{{32 + 920}}\\\\ = \frac{{920}}{{952}}\\\\ = 0.9664\\\end{array}$

The percentage is, $0.9664 \times 100 = 96.64$

8 0

2 years ago

The rectangle shown is translated 6 units to the left. Which ordered pair is NOT a vertex of the image? (A 2, -2) (B -10, 5) (C

S_A_V [24]

Use the figure above as a reference. Identify the vertices of the rectangle before translation, the vertices are (-4,5), (1, 5), (-4,-2), and (1, -2). After translation of 6 units to the left, only the x-coordinates of the vertices are affected. Since the translation is to the left, subtract 6 from the x values of the vertices. Therefore, the vertices after translation are: (-10, 5), (-5, 5); (-10, -2) and (-5, -2).

The ordered pair not in the new set of vertices is (2, -2).

7 0

2 years ago

Hel me please! Find two points from this graph.

Tatiana [17]

Answer:

-4,-8 : 8,8

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Find the domain of the function represented by the graph? A B C D

jasenka [17]