Which expression has a value of -10?

Find the value of x needed to make the equation True. 3/4(20x-8)-3=54

olasank [31]

Answer:

The answer is option B, x = 4.2

6 0

2 years ago

Write a sine function that has an amplitude of 5, a midline of 3 and a period of 1/8.

vodomira [7]

Answer:

y=5sin(16pix)+3

Step-by-step explanation:

Amp=5 means our curve is either y=5sin(bx+c)+d or y=-5sin(bx+c)+d.

y=sin(x) has period 2pi.

So y=sin(bx) has period 2pi/b.

We want 2pi/b=1/8.

Cross multiplying gives: 16pi=b

y=5sin(16pix+c)+d

d=3 since we want midline y=3.

y=5sin(16pix+c)+3

We can choose c=0 since we aren't required to have a certain phase shift.

y=5sin(16pix)+3

6 0

2 years ago

PLEASE HELP ME PLEASE

Licemer1 [7]

Answer:

x

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x) = (x-1)/3

g(x) = 3x+1

f(x) °g(x) =

Substitute g(x) in for x in the function f(x)

f(x) °g(x) = (g(x) -1)/3

= (3x+1 -1)/3

= 3x /3

=x

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Multiply. 3 2/3⋅3/4

Vlada [557]

Answer:

33/12 if simplified 2 3/4

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

2. The National Safety Council routinely analyzes the benefit of seat belt use on driver safety. Their data showed that among 28

JulijaS [17]

Answer:

We conclude that there is difference in the proportion of deaths between the 2 groups.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that among 2823 drivers not wearing seat belts, 31 died as a result of injuries, and among 7765 drivers wearing seat belts 16 were killed.

Let $p_1$ = proportion of deaths when drivers were not wearing seat belts.

$p_2$ = proportion of deaths when drivers were wearing seat belts.

So, Null Hypothesis, $H_0$ : $p_1=p_2$ {means that there is no difference in the proportion of deaths between the 2 groups}

Alternate Hypothesis, $H_A$ : $p_1\neq p_2$ {means that there is difference in the proportion of deaths between the 2 groups}

The test statistics that would be used here Two-sample z test for proportions;

T.S. = $\frac{(\hat p_1-\hat p_2)-(p_1-p_2)}{\sqrt{\frac{\hat p_1(1-\hat p_1)}{n_1}+\frac{\hat p_2(1-\hat p_2)}{n_2} } }$ ~ N(0,1)

where, $\hat p_1$ = sample proportion of deaths when drivers were not wearing seat belts = $\frac{31}{2823}$ = 0.011

$\hat p_2$ = sample proportion of deaths when drivers were wearing seat belts = $\frac{16}{7765}$ = 0.002

$n_1$ = sample of drivers not wearing seat belts = 2823

$n_2$ = sample of drivers wearing seat belts = 7765

So, the test statistics = $\frac{(0.011-0.002)-(0)}{\sqrt{\frac{0.011(1-0.011)}{2823}+\frac{0.002(1-0.002)}{7765} } }$

= 4.438

The value of z test statistics is 4.438.

Now, at 5% significance level the z table gives critical values of -1.96 and 1.96 for two-tailed test.

Since our test statistic doesn't lie within the range of critical values of z, so we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will fall in the rejection region due to which we reject our null hypothesis.

Therefore, we conclude that there is difference in the proportion of deaths between the 2 groups.

Also, Margin of error (E) = $1.96 \times \sqrt{\frac{\hat p_1(1-\hat p_1)}{n_1}+\frac{\hat p_2(1-\hat p_2)}{n_2} }$

= $1.96 \times \sqrt{\frac{0.011(1-0.011)}{2823}+\frac{0.002(1-0.002)}{7765} }$

= 0.00397

5 0

3 years ago