Answer:
The infant industry argument is an economic rationale for trade protectionism. The core of the argument is that nascent industries often do not have the economies of scale that their older competitors from other countries may have, and thus need to be protected until they can attain similar economies of scale.
Explanation:
I would have to give up my dream of getting an economics degree because I felt that an economics degree would give me a more stable future. My parents always believed that, after finishing my education, I should pursue my acting career.
I'd make another choice, since I'm happy with my job now. If I choose to perform, I should have struggled a lot.
Consumers C make decisions because each action has a risk cost. You can't do two things at the same time and must choose one.
Individual producers / nations must choose what they are to produce, how they are to produce and how much they are to produce, as their resources are limited and their alternatives are being applied.
The most important claim about Karl Marx would be the theorizing that capitalists would try to get more work from people for less pay.
<h3 /><h3>Who was Karl Marx?</h3>
He was a German philosopher who developed the foundations of communism, a system that criticized capitalism and its doctrines. His most prominent theories are about the transition to communism, the class struggle, the Marxist theory of ideology and surplus value.
Therefore, the correct option for the question refers to surplus value, which was defined for Karl Marx as the difference between the value of the work produced by employees and their salary paid. For him, the surplus value is the work produced and not paid, being a condition of exploration of the capitalist system.
Find out more about Karl Marx here:
brainly.com/question/1092276
#SPJ1
Answer:
Option B. It is unrealistic
Explanation:
The reason is that the people have different likes which means we will never see 100 percent acceptance from the customers which might in the way of rejecting the offer of Gary. So the assumption that 50,000 cab drivers will purchase its product is truly optimistic which in other words is unrealistic assumption. So the option B is correct.
Option A is incorrect because the assumption is less qualitative as it doesn't relies on realistic assumption.
The cab drivers sales are relevant here but the sales assumption was unrealistic (Highly optimistic assumption) so the option C and D are incorrect.
Option E is also incorrect because the sales to cab drivers can be measure by initially directly selling 1000 cell phone to 1000 cab drivers which will give an actual idea of sales units expected, which means it is measurable.
