The Intolerable Acts not only attacked the economic rights of people in the Massachusetts colony, but also removed their system of self-rule and representative government. The Intolerable Acts closed the port of Boston to imports and exports, appointed a military governor, barred town meetings, and prevented the election of local officials and the selection of jurors. Although colonists viewed earlier tax acts and acts to control trade as unconstitutional, this act actually deprived them of their civil rights. The Magna Carta and British Bill of Rights of 1689 indicate that the King is not above the law, and that certain civil rights are granted to British subjects to ensure that the King does not become to powerful. Among these rights are the right to trial by a jury of one's peers, and the power of taxation resting in the hands of an elected body. Both of these rights were removed with the tax act. The colonists had no form of economic or political defense against the King's absolute rule in Massachusetts.
Answer:
New practices to fight disease is the correct answer.
Explanation:
the right answer is: that educating adolescents about how to make better choices to avoid the consequences of risky behaviors does not reduce the number of risky behaviors committed by adolescents.
Because according to studies on the peer influence of adolescents and decision making says that moving past research center investigations of age contrasts in "cool" psychological procedures identified with hazard discernment and thinking, new methodologies have moved concentration to the impact of social and enthusiastic factors on immature neurocognition. When teenagers invest an expanding measure of energy with their companions, explore recommends that peer-related boosts may sharpen the reward framework to react to the reward estimation of dangerous conduct. As the intellectual control framework step by step develops through the span of the high school years, teenagers develop in their ability to facilitate influence and insight, and to practice self-direction even insincerely stimulating circumstances. These limits are reflected in progressive development in the ability to oppose peer impact.
